- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
系统护理干预在髓内钉治疗胫骨骨不连中临床应用
系统护理干预在髓内钉治疗胫骨骨不连中临床应用
[摘要] 目的 探究系?y护理干预在髓内钉治疗胫骨骨不连中的临床应用。 方法 选取哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院2014年7月~2016年7月收治的90例接受髓内钉治疗的胫骨骨不连患者,按照就诊时间顺序分为对照组(2014年7月~2015年7月)与观察组(2014年8月~2015年7月),每组各45例,对照组仅给予常规护理,观察组给予系统护理干预,均护理2个月,对比两组患者Barthel指数、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、负性情绪及护理满意度。 结果 两组护理后Barthel指数较护理前升高,VAS较护理前降低,观察组改善较对照组更加显著,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。两组护理后汉密顿焦虑量表及汉密顿抑郁量表评分均较护理前降低,观察组改善较对照组更加显著,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。对照组护理满意度为75.56%,低于观察组的93.33%,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 系统护理干预相比于常规护理可促进改善髓内钉治疗胫骨骨不连患者的临床效果,改善日常生活能力,降低疼痛感及负性情绪,提高护理满意度。
[关键词] 系统护理干预;髓内钉;胫骨骨不连
[中图分类号] R473.6 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)03(a)-0162-04
Clinical application of system nursing intervention in intramedullary nail in the treatment of tibial bone nonunion
LU Haiyan HAN Xinguang
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150001, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore clinical application of system nursing intervention in intramedullary nailing in the treatment of tibial bone nonunion. Methods 90 patients with tibial bonenonunion treated with intramedullary nailing in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from July 2014 to July 2016 were selected. All patients were divided into control group (from July 2014 to July 2015) and observation group (from August 2014 to July 2015) according to registration order, 45 cases in each group. Routine nursing was used in control group, system nursing intervention was applied in observation group. After nursing for 2 months, Barthel index, VAS, negative emotion and nursing satisfaction between two groups were compared. Results After nursing, Barthel indexes of two groups were higher than before nursing, VAS of two groups were lower than before nursing, observation group was improved significantly than control group, with statistical difference (P 0.05). After nursing, HAMA and HAMD scores of two groups were lower than before nursing, observation group was improved significantly than contr
文档评论(0)