- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
胆源性消化不良患者采取复方阿嗪米特肠溶片治疗效果分析
胆源性消化不良患者采取复方阿嗪米特肠溶片治疗效果分析
【摘要】 目的 探讨复方阿嗪米特肠溶片治疗胆源性消化不良的临床效果。方法 60例胆源性消化不良患者, 按照随机数字法分为对照组和观察组, 每组30例。对照组患者采用消炎利胆片治疗, 观察组患者采用复方阿嗪米特肠溶片治疗。比较两组患者临床症状改善时间、治疗后胃肠症状评估量表(GSRS)评分以及不良反应发生率。结果 观察组患者腹胀、恶心、呕吐症状改善时间分别为(12.32±
3.39)、(7.64±1.37)、(7.23±2.36)d均明显短于对照组的(14.28±3.69)、(8.36±1.15)、(8.44±1.54)d, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后, 观察组患者GSRS评分均明显低于对照组, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者不良反应发生率为6.67%, 明显低于对照组的26.67%, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 复方阿嗪米特肠溶片治疗胆源性消化不良效果较好, 可有效改善患者临床症状, 降低不良反应发生率, 提高患者生活质量, 值得临床推广应用。
【关键词】 复方阿嗪米特肠溶片;胆源性消化不良;消炎利胆片
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.14.007
Analysis of effect of compound azintamide enteric-coated tablets in the treatment of patients with biliary dyspepsia JI Xiu-li. Inner Mongolia Hulunbeier People’s Hospital, Hulunbeier 021008, China
【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the clinical effect of compound azintamide enteric-coated tablets in the treatment of patients with biliary dyspepsia. Methods A total of 60 patients with biliary dyspepsia were divided by random number table method into control group and observation group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with inflammation-resolving gall-bladder-excreting tablet, and the observation group was treated with compound azintamide enteric-coated tablets. Comparison were made on clinical symptom improvement time, gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) score and incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Results The observation group obviously shorter abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting symptoms improvement time as (12.32±3.39), (7.64±1.37) and (7.23±2.36) d than (14.28±3.69), (8.36±1.15) and (8.44±1.54) d in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). After treatment, the observation group had obviously lower GSRS score than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). After treatment, the observation group had obviously lower incidence of adverser reactions as 6.67% than 26.67% in the control group,
文档评论(0)