计算机网络体检系统在职业健康检查中应用.docVIP

计算机网络体检系统在职业健康检查中应用.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
计算机网络体检系统在职业健康检查中应用

计算机网络体检系统在职业健康检查中应用   [摘要] 目的 探讨计算机网络体检系统在职业健康检查中的应用。 方法 收集2014~2015年我院职业健康检查劳动者的个人信息及体检结果,将2015年接受计算机网络体检系统体检的劳动者定义为研究组,将2014年采取传统职业健康检查体检的劳动者定义为对照组。对比研究组和对照组个人报告周期、单位报告周期、替检及漏检发生情况。 结果 研究组和对照组个人报告周期及单位报告周期分别为[(1.3±0.3)d vs (2.7±0.6)d]、[(9.7±2.5)d vs (11.6±3.9)d],差异有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组和对照组替检、漏检发生率分别为(0.007% vs 0.110%)、(0.030% vs 0.140%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 将计算机网络体检系统运用于职业健康检查中,可以提高医务人员工作效率,避免替检、漏检及纸质报告的字迹潦草,实现健康档案无纸化管理,实现各部门体检数据网络传输及数据共享。   [关键词] 计算机;互联网;职业健康;检查   [中图分类号] R13;TP311 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)18-0084-04   The application of computer network physical examination system in occupational health examination   ZHONG Haocheng CHEN Jing   Department of Occupation Diseases, Hangzhou Hospital for the Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Diseases, Hangzhou 310014, China   [Abstract] Objective To explore the application of computer network physical examination system in occupational health examination. Methods The personal information and physical examination results of the occupational health examination laborers in our hospital from 2014 to 2015 were collected. The workers who received the computer network physical examination in 2015 were defined as study group, and the workers who took the traditional occupational health examination in 2014 were defined as control group. The personal reporting cycle, the unit reporting cycle, the occurrence of stand-ins and missed detection between the study group and the control group were compared. Results The personal reporting cycle and unit reporting cycle of the study group and the control group were[(1.3±0.3)d vs(2.7±0.6)d] and [(9.7±2.5)d vs (11.6±3.9)d ], respectively, and there was significant difference (P0.05). The incidence of stand-ins and missed detection of the study group and the control group were(0.007% vs 0.110%) and(0.030% vs 0.140%), and the difference was significant(P0.05). Conclusion The computer network physical examination system used in occupational health examination, can improve t

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档