- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
颈动脉狭窄程度及颈动脉粥样硬化斑块性质部位与脑梗死相关性研究
颈动脉狭窄程度及颈动脉粥样硬化斑块性质部位与脑梗死相关性研究
[摘要] 目的 探讨颈动脉狭窄程度以及颈动脉粥样硬化斑块性质、部位与脑梗死的相关性。 方法 选取2013年4月~2014年1月急性脑梗死患者100例设为观察组,同时选取100例同期就诊非急性脑梗死患者设为对照组。所有患者行头颈动脉联合CTA检查,观察颈动脉狭窄程度以及斑块分布部位,并用斑块分析软件分析颈动脉狭窄程度及斑块性质。 结果 观察组颈动脉无狭窄,中、重度狭窄及闭塞较对照组增高(25.2%,28.0%,15.5%,11.1%比54.0%,15.2%,6.8%,3.0%)(P 0.05);观察组斑块检出率高于对照组(74.8%比46.0%,P 0.01);观察组不稳定斑块比例高于稳定斑块(83.9%比38.0%)(P 0.05),对照组稳定斑块比例高于不稳定斑块(62.0%比16.1%)(P 0.05);观察组混合斑块和软斑块发生率明显高于对照组(P 0.01),对照组纤维斑块及钙化斑块发生率明显高于观察组(P 0.01)。 结论 颈动脉狭窄程度以及颈动脉粥样硬化斑块性质与急性脑梗死的发生具有明确的相关性,而颈动脉斑块部位与急性脑梗死发生无明显相关。
[关键词] 颈动脉狭窄;颈动脉斑块;不稳定斑块;脑梗死
[中图分类号] R543.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2014)09(a)-0032-04
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the relationship between the degree of carotid stenosis as well as the character of atherosclerotic plaque and cerebral infarction. Methods From April 2013 to January 2014, totally 100 acute cerebral infarction patients were studied as the observation group. Meanwhile, 100 cases who were not acute cerebral infarction were selected as the control group. Carotid artery of all were examined by carotid artery CTA to observe the degree of carotid stenosis and to judge plaque characters as well as their location. Then they were measured by plaque analysis software. Results The number of no stenosis, mild and severe stenosis and occlusion in observation group was higher than those in control group (25.2%, 28.0%, 15.5%, 11.1% vs 54.0%, 15.2%, 6.8%, 3.0%, respectively) (P 0.05); compared with control group, plaque detection rate was high (74.8% vs 46.0%) (P 0.01); in observation group, the occurrence of unstable plaque was higher than stable plaque (83.9% vs 38.0%) (P 0.05), in control group, the occurrence of stable plaque was higher than unstable plaque (62.0% vs 16.1%) (P 0.05); the incidence of mixed plaques and soft plaques in observation group was significantly higher than those of control group (P 0.01), the incidence of fibrous plaques and calcified plaques in control group was significantly higher than those of ob
文档评论(0)