毒品犯罪死刑适用问题分析-法学专业论文.docxVIP

offenses or certain behavior or identity to decide whether to appropriate death, but also make long-term imprisonment to be abused. In addition, the judges seem to dislike the application of criminal property on the property when necessary, punishment shall not apply. Second, on the basis of the above, author points out the problems about the death penalty for drug crime. The amount of drugs is easy to grasp, measure, and that the size and number of harm to the society has a direct connection. In judicial practice, if put the amount of drugs as the only standard, it will inevitably lead to higher death rates to the relevance of drug-related crimes. In addition, under the Penal Code, as long as the number of drug crimes to legal standards, you can identify a drug crime, not to purity as the standard. The advantage of this provision is that investigating authorities and the judiciary will press criminal prosecution without considering purity.This will help us improve efficiency in handling cases, but this is clearly not conducive to fight against crime accurately, sentencing is also biased. Also, conviction and sentencing standards for the transport of drugs and smuggling, trafficking, drug manufacturing are consistent in the application of the death penalty, and no special care, which is open to question. On the special circumstance, informer, the use, in our current investigation of drug-related crimes are very common, but because of abuse, there are many problems. Finally, the criminal misconduct policy had a negative impact for the death penalty. Described by the above questions, I come to my own view that we should limit the death penalty for drug crimes . Fourth, the author explained Limit the reasons for the death penalty,such as history of emotions from the people to be sterile, contrary to the principle of suiting punishment, destruction of the balance of the penalty, the need for protection of human rights, the death penalty for drug offenses have little ef