闭合复位内固定治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折的临床疗效分析.docVIP

闭合复位内固定治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折的临床疗效分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
闭合复位内固定治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折的临床疗效分析   [摘要] 目的 探?闭合复位内固定治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的临床疗效,并与切开复位内固定的疗效进行比较。方法 2014年1月~2016年1月我院收治小儿肱骨髁上骨折患者102例,其中52例用闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗(观察组),50例采用切开复位内固定治疗(对照组),比较两组的治疗效果及并发症情况。 结果 随访6个月,两组患者术后肘关节优良率及术后并发症比较,差异无统计学意义,两组疗效及并发症相当。但两组的手术时间、术中出血量及骨折愈合时间有统计学差异,观察组手术时间、出血量较对照组明显减少,骨折愈合时间较对照组明显缩短。两组术后8 h、24 h和72 h疼痛评分有统计学差异,对照组疼痛程度明显较观察组严重。术后72 h两组疼痛轻微或无明显疼痛。各组内随着术后时间的延长,疼痛逐步减轻。 结论 闭合复位内固定术治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折手术时间短、术中出血少、骨折愈合时间短、手术创伤小、术后疼痛轻微、固定可靠,手术时可优先行闭合复位内固定术,再考虑切开复位内固定术。   [关键词] 肱骨髁上骨折;闭合复位;切开复位;克氏针内固定   [中图分类号] R726.8 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)06-0071-04   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of closed reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of supracondylar fracture of humerus in children, and to compare with the effect of open reduction and internal fixation. Mehods 102 patients with supracondylar fractures of the humerus admitted in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2016 were enrolled. Among them, 52 patients were treated with closed reduction and Kirschner wire fixation (observation group). 50 patients were given open reduction and internal fixation treatment(control group), and the treatment effect and complications between the two groups were compared. Results The follow-up time was 6 months. There was no significant difference in the excellent rate of postoperative elbow flexion and postoperative complications between the two groups. The efficacy and complication of the two groups were similar. But the operation time, intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing time were statistically different between the two groups. The time of operation and the amount of bleeding in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The time of fracture healing was shorter than that of the control group. There were significant differences in pain scores between the two groups at 8 hours, 24 hours and 72 hours. The degree of pain in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation gro

文档评论(0)

聚文惠 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档