骨折患者钢板取出术后切口感染预防和护理对策.docVIP

骨折患者钢板取出术后切口感染预防和护理对策.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
骨折患者钢板取出术后切口感染预防和护理对策

骨折患者钢板取出术后切口感染预防和护理对策   [摘要] 目的 探讨骨折患者钢板取出术后切口感染预防与护理对策。 方法 随机筛选2009年8月~2011年5月我院收治的行骨折钢板取出术患者300例,并将其随机分为常规护理组(150例)和护理干预组(150例)。常规护理组实行常规护理措施,护理干预组在对患者进行个体化护理评估后,进行有针对性的护理干预。比较两组患者切口感染情况和护理满意度。 结果 护理干预组无感染病例发生,均痊愈出院。两组治疗后评分比较,护理干预组切口感染患者(0例)明显少于常规护理组(21例),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。常规护理组患者满意度(60.67%)低于护理干预组(98.67%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 对患者采取有针对性的护理干预有利于患者康复,降低切口感染的几率,提高患者的满意度。   [关键词] 骨折;钢板取出术;切口感染预防;护理对策   [中图分类号] R473.6 [文献标识码] C [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)01(c)-0134-02      Incision infection prevention and nursing strategies of patients with fracture after steel plate removal surgery   ZENG Xiuzhen   Liuzhuyuan Community Health Service Center, Xixiang Peoples Hospital of Baoan District in Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, Shenzhen 518102, China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the incision infection prevention and nursing strategies of patients with fracture after steel plate removal surgery. Methods 300 patients admitted and treated with fracture steel plate removal surgery in our hospital from August 2009 to May 2011 were randomly selected and divided into the conventional nursing group (n = 50) and the nursing intervention group (n = 50). The conventional nursing group received conventional nursing measures while the nursing intervention group received specific nursing intervention after personalized nursing evaluation. The incision infection and nursing satisfaction of both groups were compared. Results There was no occurrence of infection in the nursing intervention group and all the patients fully recovered and left hospital. The score comparison of both groups after treatment showed that the nursing intervention group (0 case) was significantly lower than the conventional nursing group (21 cases) in the incision infection, with significant difference (P < 0.05). The conventional nursing group (60.67%) was significantly lower than the nursing intervention group (98.67%) in the satisfaction rate, with significant difference (P < 0.05). Conclusion Spec

文档评论(0)

151****1926 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档