恶意诉讼侵权的法律问题探析-法律学专业论文.docxVIP

摘 要 正向建构和反向利用是制度建设的永恒命题和利益博弈。诉讼制度体现着人 类法治文明的进步和纠纷解决机制的稳定性。而恶意诉讼作为诉讼制度的反向产 物和司法的“影子问题”给司法秩序的运行带来困扰。诉讼最初被用来维护合法 权益和解决纠纷，恶意诉讼却成为不法者肆意侵害他人权益的工具。随着经济社 会的发展，恶意诉讼侵权案件数量逐年上升、范围不断扩大、形式日趋多样。 新《民事诉讼法》规定了诚实信用原则和恶意诉讼行为，体现出恶意诉讼法 律规制的加强。但目前我国恶意诉讼的法律规制体系不完整、立法缺失明显、有 效性不足。笔者以完善规制体制为核心，以立法顶层设计和司法实务操作为着力 点展开论述。笔者对恶意诉讼内涵进行界定，并提出识别途径和规制建议。本文 可分为五个部分: 第一部分：绪论和本体论分析。绪论侧重于阐述本文写作背景和研究方法， 而本体论分析将界定恶意诉讼侵权的概念、性质、特征。同时本部分还包括恶意 诉讼的危害性分析。从侵权性、法理违法性和现实危害性阐述规制恶意诉讼侵权 的必要性和紧迫性。 第二部分：恶意诉讼侵权的成因分析，包括成因一般分析和经济分析。经济 分析是本文的亮点和创新之处。笔者以成本收益分析法为工具，以“诈害案外人” 案件为模型对恶意诉讼进行经济分析。 第四部分：恶意诉讼的司法识别。从多个角度并结合司法实务阐述如何准确 的识别恶意诉讼。 第五部分：当前法律规制的效果分析，从程序法和实体法两个角度展开。完 善法律规制的对策建议和结束语。 笔者希望通过以上论述对恶意诉讼认定和规制提出观点，以引起更多关注。 关键词： 恶意诉讼，侵权，经济分析，识别，规制 Abstract Positive construction and reverse utilization have traditionally been the eternal proposition and interest game of system construction for a long time. Litigation system embodies the progress of law civilization for mankind, as well as the stability of dispute settlement mechanism. However, malicious litigation, as the “negative product” and “shadow problem” of judicial system, brings interference to the regular operation of judicial system. Lawsuits system originally has been utilized in safeguarding rights and settling disputes while malicious litigation turns it into a tool to damage others’ legitimate rights and interests. The new Civil Procedure Law has adopted principle of honesty and credibility, as well as malicious litigation. Such adoption reflects national reinforcement in regulating malicious litigation. There is no doubt that obvious deficiencies exist in current malicious litigation regulation system. Lack of systematic regulation and concrete legal provisions are main deficiencies currently exist in reality, along with poor effectiveness. The author intends to optimize legal regulation system against malicious litigation by legislation design and judicial practice innovation. Through defining the connotation of malicious litigation, the author will illustrate the ide