商业贿赂犯罪刑法适用疑难问题剖析.docVIP

商业贿赂犯罪刑法适用疑难问题剖析 　　摘 要:具有市场价格且受贿人实际取得价值的礼券应当计入商业贿赂犯罪数额;将免费旅游界定为商业贿赂,并非意味着与免费旅游相关的费用一概认定为商业贿赂数额;应将以金钱为背景、体现贿赂犯罪权钱关系的性贿赂认定为商业贿赂。受贿人在接受行贿人财物后提供了违反法律、法规、规章、政策、行业规范规定的帮助,但行贿人没有提出要求的,不能认定为“谋取不正当利益”。复数实行犯情况下以主犯的罪名确定将共犯认定为受贿罪还是非国家工作人员受贿罪,具有合理性,但在特殊情况下应根据共犯理论与有利于被告人原则进行调适。 　　关键词:商业贿赂犯罪;犯罪数额;谋取不正当利益;共犯 　　中图分类号:DF636文献标识码:A文章编号:1674-4853(2009)04-0063-07 　　 　　Several Problems on the Application of Criminal Law about Commercial Bribery Crime 　　SHEN Dong-lin1, YAN Yan2 　　(1.Peoples Procuratorate of Baoshan District,Shanghai 201900, China; 　　2.East China University of Law and Politics,Shanghai 200042,China) 　　Abstract:The vouchers that have market price and are consumed by the bribee should be included in the amount of commercial bribery. The definition of free travel as commercial bribery doesn’t mean all related cost is included in the amount of commercial bribery. Sexual bribery that implies power and money should be defined as commercial bribery. If the bribee offers help that violates law, regulation and trade norms to the briber after the acceptance of the briber’s money, but the briber doesn’t have any request, it should not be defined as “seeking unjust benefit”. Usually it is reasonable to determine whether the accusation of the accomplice is bribery or non-governmental staff bribery according to the accusation of the principal offender, but under special conditions adjustments should be made according to the theory of joint offender and the principle of benefiting to the accused. 　　Key words:commercial bribery crime; amount of the crime; seeking unjust benefit; accomplice 　　 　　2008年11月20日,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院联合发布了为社会各界广泛关注的《关于办理商业贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》(以下简称《意见》)。《意见》的出台有利于司法机关合法有效惩治商业贿赂犯罪,维护社会主义市场经济的公平竞争秩序。在深入分析《意见》的基础上,本文针对商业贿赂犯罪刑法适用过程中的若干疑难问题提出细化判断规则,期待为实务部门贯彻该司法解释提供参考,对商业贿赂犯罪的司法认定有所裨益。 　　 　　一、商业贿赂的范围及数额认定问题 　　 　　《意见》解决的最为重要的商业贿赂犯罪的基础性问题,是通过司法解释的形式明确界定了商业贿赂的范围及其数额认定规则。《意见》明确将商业贿赂的范围确定为金钱、实物以及可以用金钱计算数额的财产性利益,并通过例举核心外延的方式举例说明“可以用金钱计算数额的财产性利益”可以是提供房屋装修、含有金额的会员卡、代币卡