面向证立获致正当性的司法裁决程序.DOC

【法宝引证码】 CLI.A.1244115? 原文链接： HYPERLINK /qikan/a4c63fb0484373eb7696431dfb.html \t _blank /qikan/a4c63fb0484373eb7696431dfb.html 面向证立获致正当性的司法裁决程序  期刊名称： HYPERLINK /journal/articlebyclass?ClassCodeKey=44, \t _blank 《北方法学》 期刊年份： HYPERLINK /journal/findarticle?FilterItems.JournalYear=2018 \t _blank 2018 摘要： 通向司法独立的裁判之道是中外理论家探讨的永恒主题。瓦瑟斯特罗姆教授在《法官如何裁判》中规范性地检视司法裁决的各种可能程序，是对现实司法决策行为的模型整合，在一定程度上提升了司法行为分析的严谨程度。他在批判“规则适用导向”的形式程序基础上，描绘了由先例程序、衡平程序与两阶程序等替代性方案整合的全景构图，其中最值得称颂、更为可欲的乃是两阶程序。全景司法裁决程序的启动前提为发现的程序，它存在被证伪的可能性，导致“唯一正解”理念的失败，因而要严格接受审判中心主义下证立程序的客观审查，以防范控制影响因素中的非理性成分。如果借鉴认知心理学的双重加工系统来阐释，就表现为法官慢速的理性思维，来检验快速直觉发现假定结论的过程。作为民主法治国家的司法裁决程序唯有通过充分的证立才能获致正当性与可接受性。充分的证立可通过逻辑、对话、修辞与论题等四种基本进路，给出理由说明以实现裁判的可普遍化。这也恰恰凸显出两阶程序中第二个层次所发挥的核心功用。 英文摘要： The way of judicature leading to judicial independence is the eternal theme discussed by Chinese and foreign scholars. Professor Richard A. Wasserstrom presents normative view of various possible procedures of judicial decision in The Judicial Decision, it is the model integration of actual judicial decision - making, and promotes the degree of rigorous analysis of judicial behavior to a certain extent. On the basis of criticizing the formal procedure of rule applicable guidance, he depicts the panoramic composition integrated by precedent procedure, equitable procedure and two order procedure, among which the most praiseworthy and desirable one is the two order procedure. The starting premise of the panoramic judicial decision procedure is the discovery of the procedure. It has the possibility of being falsified, which leads to the failure of the only positive solution concept, so it is necessary to strictly accept the objective review of the procedure of the trial centralism in order to prevent the irrational components in the control factors. If the dual processing system of cognitive psychology is used for reference to illustrate, it is shown as the slow rational thinking of the judge to test the process of quick intuitio