当代中国法官地位的法社会学研究-法学理论专业论文.docx

Ab Abstract Abstract The judge as the judicial operation practice, its status as the rule of aggrandizement and has been greatly improved, but the status of judges are not and we have made achievements in the construction of judicial system matching, in recent years, the society against judges malign incident occurred frequently, such as the Guizhou Zunyi, Hunan Yongzhou judge events cut shot the judge events and Guangxi Wuzhou acid event, the public opinion on the judges evaluation is not high, the social position of supposition, not conducive to the realization of judicial function.1995 the judges law promulgate, indicate groups of judges occupation process was incorporated into the judicial reform plan, the judge after the promulgation of the state since the social status as the main research object, from the historical and cultural background, and social science research methods, analysis of the legal status, political status, economic status, judicial and social status of judges occupation evaluation, think Chinese traditional judicial and administrative be made one, executive and judicial officer, while the current Chinese judicial remained in administrative management, the judges have no independent transcendental status and judicial organs financial right and human right belongs to the local authorities at all levels, judge the trial not against local administrative power intervention, and western modern legal state compared to judges, at present our country judges status is not high, often cannot get effective protection. That is to say, the legal system and the design itself is not conducive to the implementation of social respectability, and the judge also did not think of themselves in a sacred occupation, plus the judges self-discipline is insufficient, and the lack of effective external constraint mechanism, leading some judicial corruption appearance, affect the judicial justice, judicial authority is damaged. The judicial history of our country and t