网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

分布式文件系统名字空间管理-计算机系统结构专业论文.docx

分布式文件系统名字空间管理-计算机系统结构专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共52页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
分布式文件系统名字空间管理-计算机系统结构专业论文

华中科 技大学硕士学位论 华 中 科 技 大 学 硕 士 学 位 论 文 II II Abstract With the rapid development of internet, more and more materials need to be stored in the disk. The amount of global information grow more than 30 percent over a year, and the data that needs to be stored to the disk grow more than 114 percent over a year. Traditional file system like ext2, ext3 and net file system (NFS) can’t feed our needs, At this moment, distribute file system come into our sight. Distribute file system can store 1 PB to dozens of PB data, it can feed us well. Traditional file system typically uses 3 party architecture, and nameserver is the brain of all nodes. Nameserver typically faces C10K problem , so how to design the nameserver to adapt it to high concurrency problem becomes more and more important. This paper design and implement the distribute file system named RaccoonFS. The paper also analyzes and solves the problem that nameserver behaves bad after high concurrency because of the lock, it proposes a new namespace management method. RacoonFS uses B+ tree to manage namespace metadata, and implement copy on write and multiversion concurrency control on the B+ tree, so the read operations and write operations separate from each other and write operations can do concurrently. The things above contribute much to the performance of RaccoonFS. In the test part, we choose three kinds of object to test : the hadoop distribute file system, the B+ tree namespace management that has implemented copy on write , the B+ tree namespace management that has implemented copy on write and multiversion concurrency control. The result show that the B+ tree namespace management that has implemented copy on write and multiversion concurrency control behaves better than the B+ tree namespace management that has implement copy on write , and the B+ tree namespace management that has implement copy on write behaves better than hadoop distribute file system. The test also shows that copy on write and multiversion

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档