网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

典型商标侵权行为构成要件探讨-法律专业论文.docx

典型商标侵权行为构成要件探讨-法律专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共37页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
典型商标侵权行为构成要件探讨-法律专业论文

华中科技大学硕士学位论文 华 中 科 技 大 学 硕 士 学 位 论 文 II II Abstract From the angle of trademark protection, the core concept of current China Trademark Law is trademark infringement. In judicial practice, the determination of trademark infringement bears much difficulty and it also attracts a lot of attention. Along with the economic development and the enhancement of legal awareness, the quantity of trademark litigation has been increasing. Hence, the judgement of trademark infringement is quite significant. This paper tries to review the constitution element of trademark infringement from the view of concrete application in judicial trial. Through summing-up and analysis of these elements, the author desires to evoke deep thoughts and extensive researches on the constitution elements of trademark infringement. Based on these thoughts and researches, valuable achievement for the reference of legislation can be obtained. Through this, China’s legislation on trademark will be more practical, better and easier to be applied. This paper is divided into four parts. Via quoting an case in foreword, the author brings forward the issues in finding the trademark infringement. In part 1, the author defines the typical trademark infringement action. In part 2, the author discusses the Three Elements theory of typical trademark infringement constitution element. Then, this part analyses the judicial application of Three Element theory and summarizes the views of the author. In part 3, the author analyses the Four Element theory of typical trademark infringement constitution element. As the small difference between the first three elements of the four elements theory and three elements theory, this part focuses on the controversial centre, which is whether confusion theory should be taken as the foundation to determine the similarity of trademarks and commodities or as the constitution element to determine trademark infringement, of above two theories. Finally, the author expresses her own ide

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档