网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

盗窃罪的若干问题研究-刑事诉讼法专业论文.docx

盗窃罪的若干问题研究-刑事诉讼法专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共45页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
盗窃罪的若干问题研究-刑事诉讼法专业论文

PAGE PAGE 1 Abstract Thieves and burglars crimes is the first crimnal in our country, however, it seems too simple that the larceny was scripted, the devided deferent understandings about the currminal inpractice, make the deferent judges about a same curriminal behavior. At the same time, with the developemt of the economy, some traditonal values confront the suspations, so the study of the thieves and burglars crimes appears more and more important. This paper put the theory into practice to study about the subjective aspect of thieves and burglars crimes, the amount of the thieves and burglars crimes, the Criminal Attempt and Criminal accomplish, and prescribed punishment towards thieves and burglars crimes .To make the law making of larceny better, to consolidate the deferent understanding, to make the applacation right. The whole paper has three parts: Part one, the subjective aspect of thieves and burglars crime. This part based at subjective content of intent tries to set about from the three items of similar cases and emphasizes different connotations between society harmfulness and illegality awareness. It concludes we generally make society harmfulness as normative element of intent content, so as to set mind on the actual value of the stolen article for the amount stolen when handling the similar cases about cognition mistake. We do not demand whether the conductor is aware of criminal irregularity for his behavior, including the conditions such as taking stealing as occupation or main income sources, is a hardened thief or not, having a general intent for the stolen goods, and so on. For some specific occasions combing the conductors experience, even a normal rational people will have significant wrong cognition for the value of stolen article. In those cases, we can consider being convicted but free from criminal punishment although the conductor really has no way to know actual value of stolen goods. Part two, the Criminal Attempt and Criminal accom

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档