谢明阳-成功大学.PDF

成大中文學報 第二十五期 2009 年 7 月 頁 121-152 國立成功大學中文系 清初西泠派詩學論析 ─ 以柴紹炳、毛先舒論詩書為開展 謝明陽＊ 摘 要 清初「西泠派」為繼承晚明「雲間派」而興起的詩歌派別，其派由「西泠十子」 組成，十子中又以詩名最盛的陸圻居首，但就詩歌理論而言，則以柴紹炳和毛先舒 的論述最具代表性。西泠十子因出陳子龍門下，故詩學立場偏向於前、後七子的復 古一路，然從雲間派到西泠派，復古詩學也在明清易代之際產生了實質的變化，值 得我們予以探究。順治7 年，柴紹炳和毛先舒合力選評《西陵十子詩選》，正式確 立了西泠一派的詩歌風貌，但柴、毛二子的詩學見解卻頗有異同，彼此曾反覆寄書 論辯，進而豐富了西泠派的詩學內涵。本文將以柴紹炳、毛先舒的論詩書作為討論 起點，剖析二人對於「雅」、「豔」交涉之詩學議題的不同思考方式，藉以闡明西 泠派詩歌理論的時代特色，以及柴、毛二子人格志趣之分殊。 關鍵詞：清初詩學、西泠派、西泠十子、柴紹炳、毛先舒 The Analysis of the Poetics of the Xi-Ling School in the Early Qing Dynasty: Unfolds ＊ 國立東華大學中國語文學系副教授。 121 成 大 中 文 學 報 第 二 十 五 期 with Chai Shao-Bing’s and Mao Xian-Shu’s Letters on Poetics Hsieh Ming-Yang Associate Professor, Department of Chinese, National Dong Haw University Abstract Inheriting the Yun-Jian School of the late Ming Dynasty, the Xi-Ling School in the early Qing Dynasty arose as one of the poetic schools and consisted of Xi-Ling Ten Poets, headed by the most famous poet Lu-Qi, but best represented by Chai Shao-Bing and Mao Xian-Shu in terms of the poetic theory. As disciples of Chen Zi-Long, Xi-Ling Ten Poets, hence, favored the Former and Latter Seven Poets’ classical stances, but while evolving from Yun-Jian school to Xi-Ling school, the classical poetics experienced substantial changes, which are worth our study, in the late Ming and the early Qing Dynasty. In the Seventh Year of the Shun-Zhi Reign, Chai Shao-Bing and Mao Xian-Shu worked together and compiled The Selection of Xi-Ling Ten Poets, which later formally and clearly set up the poetic style of the Xi-Ling school. However, there