Wheatstone-Panum极限情况中的深度机制.docVIP

  1. 1、本文档共20页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
中南民族大学硕士学位论文 Abstract Due to the fact that the human eyes are horizontally separated, the images projected onto the retinas from the three-dimensional (3D) world would, in general, be incompletely asymmetric. Except the location, these asymmetries also include asymmetry in number of features in the two images. In this situation, the originals of depths of the perceptual features is an important theme for stereoscopic vision research. However, even for the simplest case as Wheatstone-Panum’s limiting case, issue of the depths of the perceived two lines was derived from double fusion (that is, both of the double lines in one eye fused wit h the single line in the other eye) or the single fusion (the depth of only one feature originated from binocular fusion of features, while the depth of the other derived from other non-binocular cues) has not been resolved even after over 170 years’ exploration and debating. Over the years, this phenomenon was generally seen as a limiting case of normal stereopsis and if just reduced only one of the features and then stereopsis disappeared. It was generally considered that double fusion happened in the case and the relative depth contributed to the relative disparity in the two fusions. However, in recent years, with the rise of occlude theory, some researchers considered that the Wheatstone-Panum’s limiting case belongs to one of occluding configurations should be seen as one version of Da Vinci stereopsis and the uniqueness constrain was still valid, that is, the single line in one just fused one of the double lines in the other eye, the other monocular line derived its depth from some non-stereopscopic factors such as occlusion, camouflage and vergence error. And in recent years, several experimental evidences based on Wheatstone-type configurations made the issue even more complicated and confusing. It’s hard to understand that under the same condition of small 1 Wheatstone-Panum 极限情况中的深度机制 disparities, why the Panum’s limiting

文档评论(0)

bcll + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档