两种导管消融术式治疗短病程持续性心房颤动疗效对比分析.pdf

两种导管消融术式治疗短病程持续性心房颤动疗效对比分析.pdf

两种导管消融术式治疗短病程持续性心房颤动疗效对比分析

中文摘要 2本研究平均随访时间为18.1月。长期随访数据显示,两种策略在 首次消融术后房颤复发率无差异,但CPVI+左房项部+三尖瓣峡部消融策 略术后房速/房扑发生率较少,推测能够改善患者术后生活质量。 3本研究认为,对于病程小于2年的短病程持续性房颤患者,采用 CPVI+左房顶部+三尖瓣峡部消融策略具有更高的安全性和有效性,临床 综合治疗效果更好,适合推广应用。 关键词:电生理学;心房颤动;导管消融;射频电流;线性消融 英文摘要 A ofClinicalEffectbetweenTwo of Comparison Strategies forCatheter on Therapy AblationPatientswithShortCourse PersistentAtrialFibrillation ABSTRACT ective:Asakindof obj treatmentforatrialfibrillation,theeffectiveness of catheterablationhasbeenverified radiofrequency constantly,and widely in recentten indicationhasextendedfromthe appliedclinically years.The AFtothe AF.For thecourseofthe AF,as paroxysmalpersistentpersistent disease substrateamore roleinthe extends,theplays important maintaining ofAFindurationtoatrial restructure.At electrical/organizationalpresent, most centersusedtotakecircumferentialvein electrophysiology pulmonary linear alliancewithrooflinear、mitralisthmusand isolation(CPVI)in linearablation.MitralisthmusablationCan isthmus tricuspid especially theSuccess atthesametimeincreasetheleftatrialmacro increase rate,but re.entrantatrial SOastoreduce effect.Thisisto tachycardia

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档