名公书判清明集惩恶门豪横类中的豪民-中正大学历史学系.PDFVIP

中正歷史學刊 民國98年 第十二期，頁113-138 黃慶中 * 摘要 透過對《清明集‧豪橫類》中所載各篇判詞作文本分析，本文認為： 一、在判詞中，豪民與富民的涵義有別，豪民不單指富有的人。二、在 判詞中，各個豪民在恐嚇或詐欺取財等不法行為上並沒有顯著差別。但 豪民在發展社會關係時，常常與官方打交道，藉此取得某些特權，進而 利用這些特權侵奪國家財政收入，這是值得注意的事情。三、在對豪民 的文字描述上，名公們多以朝廷權威為出發，強調官與民之間應保持距 離。透過比喻，將豪民描述成加害者，使受害者形象顯明，運用「警示」 的語氣達到效果，塑造豪民「惡人」的形象。 關鍵詞： 豪民、官民關係 * 國立中正大學歷史研究所碩士班 113 Chung Cheng Journal of History December, 2009 No.12, pp.113-138 A study of ‘Hao-min’ in Minggong Shupan Qingming Ji Huang Ching-Chung Abstract Through analyzing the judgments of the Qingming Ji, the paper comes to three main conclusions. Firstly, the meaning between ‘Hao-min’ （豪民）and ‘rich people’ is different. The two terms can not refer to each other. Secondly, there is no significant difference in illegal behaviors between each ‘Hao-min’. In the development of a society, however, in order to gain certain privileges ‘Hao-min’ used to bribe officials and then infringing upon the revenue of the government. It is a noteworthy point. Finally, most of the descriptions of the ‘Hao-min’ are based on the authority’s point of view which emphasized the distance between officials and the public. By using metaphors, ‘Hao-mins’ are described as perpetrators in order to highlight the image of their victims. More then that, a tone of ‘warning’ was also used in the judgments to build up negative images of ‘Hao-mins’. Key words: Hao-min （豪民）, the relationship between officials and the public 114 《名公書判清明集‧懲惡門