管子文献学研究中国古典文献学专业论文.docxVIP

中文摘要黹文主要以南宋绍典年同具榻忱《序》的浙刻本捣坐檩，比封各獯版本的《管子》。银 中文摘要 黹文主要以南宋绍典年同具榻忱《序》的浙刻本捣坐檩，比封各獯版本的《管子》。银 雀山漠筒舆《管子》相阋篇章的互遥，蠢明《管子》麈生早於银雀山《王兵》篇。敦煌抄本 《管子》的残片，蠢明唐代《管子》流傅甚赓。唐宋晴期的颓害舆浙刻本《管子》的比封， 能麴打正浙刻本用字的讹误，但颓害非蔫全文抄绿，乃是有所刚溅，遣是需要注意的。 宋版主要有一獯，即浙江刻本。明代的《管子》刻本，本文主要考查五獯，即到绩《管 子藕注》本；朱柬光《中都四子》本：趟用贸《管韩台刻》本；朱畏春《管子榷》本：渡汝 亨本《管子》。别绩本舆南宋浙刻本有比鞍大的不同，有的篇章藉句鞍浙刻本耦少；有的鞍 浙刻本稳多。到本遇多出二十畿保注解，遥明《管子注》的流傅非南人们想象的那檬，祗有 一疆形憋。《中都四子》本僚翻刻到绩本，形憋舆到绩本又有不同，《四庳提要》秤日“是害 帕本最下者也”，其寅未必盎然。《管子榷》本刊印遇程中靴误较多。渡汝亨本《管子》熙注， 舆上述裳獯《管子》版本不同。 清代主要考查《管子》的四獯版本：《四庳全害》抄到聩《管子辅注》本和趟用贸《管 裤台刻》本；清刻趟用臂本：《二十二子》本。民圜年同主要考查《百子全害》本。《四庳全 害》本《管子楠注》舆明刻到缜本有很大的不同，以四庳本意佳，四库本富是借鐾浙刻本和 趟用餮本系统。《四庳全害》抄趟用暨本，封明刻趟本有校正，但抄寓亦有疏漏之弊。《二十 二子》本和《百子全害》本是比鞍通行的版本，封浙刻本和明刻趟本的疏漏有所打正，但也 存在靴袈。雀明刻趟本明始，有将《管子》的古文字改稳流行文字的趣势，直至(--十二子》 本和《百子全害》本，遣程越势一直存在。本蒜文梳理《管子》各疆版本形悲，弑圜封《管 子》版本的流燮作比赖明晰的谕趣。 圈键嗣：《管子》；银雀山漠筒：庸宋烦害；刻本；抄本 Abstractnis Abstract nis thesis briefly summarized guanz／罾produce and its spread at the papers beginning．The writer think that Simaqian and Bangu who lived in Han dynasty believed that guanz／was written by Guanzhong who was great statesman in Chunqiu Dynasty．But from Hart dynasty,almost in every Dynasty had scholars put up argument that the book was not written by Guanzhong himself．ne most scientific deduce guanz／§written time was in last century after 50ths．one is that many bamboo books and books copied silk had been emerged． This paper contrast many edition of guanzi．From bamboo books in Ymqun，we could deduce that Wangbing,which was belonged to bamboo books generated latter than that of guanzi．The written books in Dunhuang could be deduced that the book was spread broadly in Tang and Song Dynasty．Though the written book was not the best edition,it could help inferred the beginning model of the book．The category books which was written in Tang and Song Dynasty could revised the wrengly words in guanzi．We must pay attention that the category books usually written down guand not according their beginning test,but abbreviate them． in Song Dynasty,guanzi mainly had two editions．One