比较不同评价方法评价结果的两个新指标-南京师范大学学报.PDF

31 3 () Vol. 31 No. 3 2008 9 JOURNAL OF NANJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY ( Natural S ien e Edition) Sep, 2008 比较不同评价方法评价结果的两个新指标 俞立平, 潘云涛, 武夷山 (, 100038) [ ] 2007, TOPSIS 6. , . ; ; , ; , , . [ ] , , [ ] C32 [ ] A [ ] 100 146 16( 2008) 030 13506 TwoNew Indicators to CompareDifferentEvaluationMethods Effect Based on TimesHigherQSWorld niversityRankings Y u L ip ing, Pan Y untao, W u Y ishan ( In stitute of S ientifi and Te hn i al Inform ation of Ch ina, Beij ing 100038, Ch in a) Abstract:Adopting the data of the 2007 T mi es H igher- QS world university rankings, th is paper analyzes world un iver s ity rank ings a ording to prin iple om ponents analys is, fa tor analys is, te hn ique for order preferen e by smi ilarity to ideal solution, rank sum ratio, grey relational analysis, Entropy analysis, then analy ses the evaluation resu lts sam eness and differen e based on s ide sam eness ind i ator and d ifferent ratio. The resu lts show the top un ivers ities side sam eness is h igher than that of bottom un iversities, the side d ifferen t ratios is h igher than that ofm idd le universities. The different ratio is independent of standard error. The evaluation resu lts is a good m ethod to lassify. Comb in ing peer review w ith mi personal evaluation is su itab le form i ro osm i rank ing. K ey words: S T and edu ation evaluation, side sameness, different ratio , , , . , . , , . , , , ; , , TOPSIS. , , , , , , . [ 1] . , : : ( 2006BAH 03B05)( . : , , , : .