- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
肛门尖锐湿疣冷冻治疗后0.1%利凡诺尔与4%硼酸湿敷的临
床疗效比较研究
万宏程1杨春俊2(通讯作者)
(1安徽省六安市人民医院皮肤科237005; 2安徽医科大学第一附属医院皮肤科 230022)
【屮图分类号】R752.3+3【文献标识码】A【文章编号】1672-5085 (2012 ) 29-0251-02
【摘要】目的比较4%硼酸液和0.1%利凡诺尔液在液氮冷冻治疗肛门尖锐湿疣 后湿敷对疗效和减少不良刺激的作用差别。方法口9例肛门周围尖锐湿疣患者, 冷冻治疗后随机分别采用0.1%的利凡诺尔粉湿敷(E组,n = 59)或4%的硼酸液 湿敷(B组,n = 60)。比较2组间疗效和不良反应。并对患者湿敷时刺激进行白 我评分分析。结果105例完成治疗随访,E组51例、B组54例;创面愈合时间 B组为6?28 d,(平均10.43d), E组为5?26d(平均13.45d); B组治疗次数为 3.43(1?7次)、E组为3.87(2?8次),两组比较差异均具有显著性。关于肛门周 围水肿、局部溃疡形成和大便习惯的改变以及刺激性自我评分等,2组间均存在 差异。结论4%的硼酸液湿敷与0.1%利凡诺尔液湿敷相比,不仅可以提高冷冻的 疗效,减少治疗次数,还可以降低不良反应的发生率,以及减少患者冷冻治疗后 的不适感。
【关键词】尖锐湿疣 肛门 利凡诺尔 硼酸 湿敷
A Comparison study of clinic effective between ethacridine and boric acid wet compress after treatment of anal genital warts with cry therapy? Wan Hongchengl,Liu Yangshengl, Yang Chunjun MD2
IWan hongcheng, Department of Dermatology of Peoplersquo;s Hospital of Luan 2Yang chunjun,Department of Dermatology at the first Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University.
【Abstract] To compare the efficacy and adverse effects between 0.1% ethacridine and 4% boric acid wet compress after treatment of anal genital warts with cryotherapy.Methods: One hundred and nineteen patients with anal genital warts were enrolled into a randomized clinical trial.They were treated with liquid nitrogen cryotherapy, and then treated with wet compress with 0.1% ethacridine (E group, n = 59) or 4% boric acid(B group, n = 60) respectively.The efficacy and adverse effects were recorded and compared with the two groups.A questionnaire about therapy exciti ng was con ducted after treatment.Results: 105 patients completed the study, (E group, n = 51) or 4% boric acid(B group, n = 54).The wound surface was healing from 6?28 days (10.43 days in average) in the B group, and from 5~26 days (13.45 days in average) in the E group.The treatment times in the B group was 3.43(1 ?7 times), and 3.87(2?8 times) in the E group.The treatment times and wound surface healing time between the two groups were significant difference.The adve
文档评论(0)