基于现代医学模式的慢性前列腺炎危险因素病例对照研究-公共卫生与预防医学专业论文.docxVIP

  • 2
  • 0
  • 约5.06万字
  • 约 56页
  • 2019-03-23 发布于上海
  • 举报

基于现代医学模式的慢性前列腺炎危险因素病例对照研究-公共卫生与预防医学专业论文.docx

Abstractobjective:To Abstract objective:To study the risk factors of chronic prostatitis disease.and to provide scientific evidence for intervention measures,a case-control study was carried out based on the modem medical mode of”biological—psychological—social”. Methods:202 patients with chronic prostatitis diagnosed by uropoiesis surgical department doctor during urban male worker physical examination were cases;controls were consist of 204 age-matched men without chronic prostatitis who did physical examination at the same time in the hospital.Data was collected by interview survey and physical examination,including social demographic characteristics,psychological symptom,social support,and current health status.Descriptive analysis,case。control study,and multiple factors analysis method were used to analyse hazard factors of chronic prostatitis. Results:Cultural degree,medical costs,family income and working pressure had significant difference between case group and control group(P0.05).Specimens of 202 cases of patients with chronic prostatitis prostate fluid bacterial culture according to the results,there are 55 samples detected pathogenic bacteria,detection rate was 27.23%, among them,74.56%were coagulase negative staph)7lococcus aureus.The results of Symptom checkli sts 90 suggested that the score of depression,anxiety and hostility differed between cases and controls,the mean score of cases was higher than that of controls,and the difference had statistical significance(P0,05).According to the results of Social support rating scale,social support total score and social support utilization degree score varied between cases and controls,controls’SCOre were statistical significant higher than cases(P0.05).After binary Logistic regression analysis,social support utilization degree scoring and anxiety factor scoring entered into the regression model,the OR values were 2.644(95%CI,1.527 to 4.578),0.836(95%CI, 0.755 to 0.926),respectively. Conclusions:Biological

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档