国内外油气长输管道应力分析标准的比较-油气储运.PDF

设计与施工 2015 年 2 月　第 34 卷 第 2 期 1000-8241 2015 02-0186-04 文章编号： （ ） 国内外油气长输管道应力分析标准的比较 庞永莉　张小龙 西安长庆科技工程有限责任公司，陕西西安 710018 摘要：对比分析了国内规范与ASME 规范关于油气长输管道应力分析的评价标准。针对油气长输 管道，两个体系的规范都遵循强度理论制定管道应力评价标准。ASME 规范按照受约束与非约束 管道制定了管道应力的校核标准，国内规范按照一般地段、穿越地段和跨越地段3 种管道敷设条件 分别制定了管道强度的校核标准，在一定程度上参考了ASME 规范的相关规定。对比两个规范体 系，最新版本的ASME 油气长输管道规范对油、气管道应力校核标准趋于一致，而国内规范更新相 对滞后，输油与输气管道的校核标准不统一，且缺少对输油气管道不受约束条件下的热胀应力规定， 存在改进的空间。建议跟踪ASME 规范，尽快修订国内相关标准。（表2，参11） 关键词：输油管道；输气管道；应力分析；热胀应力；轴向应力；纵向应力；校核标准 中图分类号：TE832 　　　　 文献标识码：A　 　　　doi ：10.6047/j .issn.1000-824 1.2015.02.016 Comparison of stress analysis criteria for long-distance oil and gas pipeline in China and abroad PANG Yongli, ZHANG Xiaolong Xian Changqing Technology Engineering Co. Ltd., Xian, Shaanxi, 710018 Abstract: In This paper presents a comparative analysis of the evaluation criteria in stress analysis for long-distance oil and gas pipeline in China and ASME standards. For long-distance oil and gas pipeline, both systems are based on the theory of strength. ASME standards provide the check criterion for pipeline stress in view of restrained and unrestrained pipelines, while the Chinese standards separately stipulate the check criteria for pipeline strength in view of three pipeline laying conditions (i.e. ordinary section, crossing section and bridging section) which partly refers to the ASME standards. Comparison between two systems indicates that the latest ASME standards provide basically consistent check criteria for both oil and gas pipelines, while the Chinese standards which are updated relatively slo