加害给付法律问题研究民商法学专业论文.docxVIP

I I 摘 要 摘 要 加害给付源于德国的积极侵害债权理论。在这之后，日本、瑞士等国家将其发展为 成文化的“不完全给付”制度，我国台湾地区的不完全给付制度也是在很大程度上借鉴 日本的相关理论建立的。目前，我国大陆民法中的加害给付制度是由台湾地区的不完全 给付制度发展来的。依据我国加害给付制度相关学术观点和法律规范来看，加害给付的 实质是合同之债中履行不适当的一种表现形式，同时它造成了债权人固有利益的损害， 但固有利益保护问题属于侵权法的范畴，因此加害给付成为合同法与侵权法的一个边界 法律问题。在司法实务中，加害给付的处理多主张按责任竞合问题来解决。但传统的责 任竞合理论不能对受害人的合法权益给予周全保护。本文运用历史的，比较的研究方法 介绍了加害给付的起源与发展、分析其构成要件，深入剖析了加害给付产生损害后果的 不同情形，并研究各情形需承担的法律责任，从中发现仅凭责任竞合尚不足以充分保护 受害人权利，从而得出运用责任聚合理论的合理性，指出我国合同法中对加害给付问题 规定的不足之处，提出我国的加害给付制度的完善建议。 关键词 加害给付 履行利益 固有利益 责任聚合 制度完善 II II Abstract Abstract Injuring performance originated in Germany in the theory of positive infringement of creditors rights theory.After that, Japan,Switzerland and other countries developed it into the system of incomplete payment.The system of incomplete paymentof Chinas Taiwan region is also useful in the theory of Japan largely.Injuring performance of civil law in china is on the development of positive infringement of creditors rights theory.According to the academic point of view and legal norms on injuring performance system of Chinese mainland , the essence of injuring performance is a form of inappropriate fulfill about debt contract obligation. At the same time,it caused damage to the inherent interests of the creditors.But the protection of inherent interests belong to Tort Law.Therefore injuring performance become boundary legal issues of Contract Law and Tort Law.In judicial practice,the processing of injuring performance should follow the concurrence of liability problem to solve.But the traditional concurrence of liability theory can not make full compensation to the damage of the victim.This paper based on the historical and comparative study to introduce the origin and development of injuring performance,and analyses the elements about injuring performance,deeply analyses the different circumstances of harmful consequences about injuring performance and study the legal liability should be assumed,found that only by coincidence of liability is not enough to fully