- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
重庆大学硕士学位论文 英文摘要
ABSTRACT
With the development of science, the progress of the society, the population density
is become bigger and bigger, high buildings become the mainstream of modern society
construction. With high buildings become a reality, tossed object from high building also
common occurrence, among them, damage caused by unknown tossed object from high
building , because of its unknown infringement subjects, the victim in this case is
difficulty in proof, therefore, the social impact in such cases judgment is not very good.
So, research for the damage caused by unknown tossed object from high building has
important theoretical significance and practical significance. Fortunately, in July 1, 2010,
the tort law has taken effect officially, among them the article 87 stipulates the
responsibility clearly about the damage caused by unknown tossed object from high
building, made the similar cases has a legal basis. But, with the tort law has taken effect,
the law experts and scholars also launched a big discussion about the tort law’s 87th. In
the article, the author proposed by the case “Shenzhen haolaiju”Which leads to the
damage caused by unknown tossed object from high building cases for further study, and
analysis the tort law’s 87th with The focus in the case. Carry forward the advantages,
consummate the shortage. Put forward the proposal to the Theoretical research and the
application of law, hoping this can help to solve the similar cases later.
This paper consists of five parts:
The first part: with an overview of the case “Shenzhen haolaiju”, analysis the two
focuses in the case: the choice of imputation principle and responsibility main
您可能关注的文档
- 不同体位下经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症.pdf
- 自媒体环境下的隐私权保护——兼评《侵权责任法》第36条.pdf
- 负面在线消费者评论及商家应对策略对消费者购买意愿的影响-研究.pdf
- 儿童生活质量普通适用核心量表4.0中文版在多发性抽动症儿童的信度效度.分析.pdf
- 从家庭到社会——评海尔曼三部家庭剧中的“离家结局”的作用.pdf
- 大别山山核桃品种类型及其品质的-研究.pdf
- 元好问题画诗-研究.pdf
- 论我国公众评估警察绩效的机制构建.pdf
- 初中生情绪调节方式与心理健康关系-研究.pdf
- 论我国行贿人作证交易制度的建构与适用——兼评我国刑法第390条第二款及其完善.pdf
- 评日本“强制劳工诉讼”案.pdf
- 审慎的转折%3a在市场与分配正义之间——评约翰·斯图亚特·密尔的《政治经济学原理》.pdf
- 产妇焦虑和去甲肾上腺素、5—羟色胺对剖宫产连续硬膜外麻醉效果的影响.pdf
- 中继协作传输方案及性能-研究.pdf
- PEA方案与5-Fu%2bKSM方案治疗妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的临床比较.pdf
- 基于身份的数字签名方案的-研究.pdf
- 论我国著作权法合理使用制度——兼评《著作权法》第三次修改草案第42条.pdf
- 普通高中学生写作问题及对策.分析.pdf
- 对比XELOX方案与FOLFOX方案针对转移性结直肠癌的疗效和安全性的meta.分析.pdf
- 基于新课程标准的作文评改-研究.pdf
文档评论(0)