活体器官移植的伦理审视-伦理学专业论文.docxVIP

and let the hope of his or her patient to achieve health come true. On the other hand, the author also thinks there are many living organ transplant ethical challenges. Follows the “good”, it might be evil”. So the author discussed it from four aspects: (1) Is it violate the medical humanitarian since organ transplant damages the donors health? Is this valuable? (2) Whether under the interests the hospital can be truly informed consent? Will the living-donor face moral pressure, so that charity becomes obligations? (3) Can human organs be commercialized? Will living donor organ transplantation lead to a more popular style of trading? How to solve these problems? The author finally find some ways: First, construct some reasonable rules of ethics: the principle of respect for life, the principle of precautionary, the principle of informed consent, the principle of free donations, and the principle of protection of vulnerable groups. If everyone internalizes these rules into their own behavior, no doubt that the best interests of the community would be realized. Second, establish new concepts: righteousness, profit, death. If the utilitarianism becomes a dominant ideology, then the righteous spirit will be overshadowed. If the traditional concept of death is still use to determine the persons death, then organ resources will always be scarce, living organ transplants will be carry on, and its ethical is still embarrassed. Third, strengthen the correct guidance of public opinion; let the public get a comprehensive understanding of the Transplants, then judge the value and decide their behavior themselves. Fourth, perfect laws and regulations, strengthen the ethical review. People usually have bad habits, which needs to regulate by law. if there have perfect relevant laws and regulations, the organ trading will be stopped. Fifth, improve the technical of health care and reduce medical risk, thus receptors can live longer and minimize the risk. All in all, The author beli