First-Order-Logic课件.pptxVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
First-Order Logic精品文档Limitations of propositional logicSuppose you want to say “All humans are mortal”In propositional logic, you would need ~6.7 billion statementsSuppose you want to say “Some people can run a marathon”You would need a disjunction of ~6.7 billion statements精品文档First-order logicPropositional logic assumes the world consists of atomic factsFirst-order logic assumes the world contains objects, relations, and functions精品文档Syntax of FOLConstants: John, Sally, 2, ... Variables: x, y, a, b,...Predicates: Person(John), Siblings(John, Sally), IsOdd(2), ...Functions: MotherOf(John), Sqrt(x), ...Connectives: ?, ?, ?, ?, ?Equality: = Quantifiers: ?, ? Term: Constant or Variable or Function(Term1, ... , Termn) Atomic sentence: Predicate(Term1, ... , Termn) or Term1 = Term2Complex sentence: made from atomic sentences using connectives and quantifiers精品文档Semantics of FOLSentences are true with respect to a model and an interpretationModel contains objects (domain elements) and relations among themInterpretation specifies referents forconstant symbols → objectspredicate symbols → relationsfunction symbols → functional relations An atomic sentence Predicate(Term1, ... , Termn) is true iff the objects referred to by Term1, ... , Termn are in the relation referred to by predicate精品文档Universal quantification?x P(x)Example: “Everyone at UNC is smart”?x At(x,UNC) ? Smart(x)Why not ?x At(x,UNC) ? Smart(x)?Roughly speaking, equivalent to the conjunction of all possible instantiations of the variable:At(John, UNC) ? Smart(John) ? ...At(Richard, UNC) ? Smart(Richard) ? ...?x P(x) is true in a model m iff P(x) is true with x being each possible object in the model精品文档Existential quantification?x P(x)Example: “Someone at UNC is smart”?x At(x,UNC) ? Smart(x)Why not ?x At(x,UNC) ? Smart(x)?Roughly speaking, equivalent to the disjunction of all possible instantiations:[At(John,UNC) ? Smart(John)] ?[At(Richard,UNC) ? Smart(Richard)] ? … ?x P(x) is true in a model m iff P(

文档评论(0)

liuxiaoyu92 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档