美国政坛与体坛人物访谈中话语策略使用的个案分析-英语语言文学专业毕业论文.docxVIP

硕士拳位论文MASTER’S 硕士拳位论文 MASTER’S THE$1S 度地违反合作原则且同时对第三方表示礼貌，但政治人物使用话语策略的频率高于 体育人物，政治人物在访谈中倾向于充分利用一切机会阐述自己的观点来影响观 众。但文章无法得出政治人物更善于使用会话策略的结论，这是因为话语策略的运 用首先取决于所提的问题是否会对面子和利益构成威胁，很显然，政治访谈中敏感 问题占大多数，灵活使用各种会话策略是一种必要；其次受访者身份特殊性也决定 其必须考虑的因素更多，间接回答成为一种必然。 关键词：合作原则；礼貌原则；面子威胁行为；策略；语境；新闻访谈 AbstractThis Abstract This PaDelatterupts a conversational analysis of televised news interviews with present American Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the famous golf star Tiger Woods from the pragmatic perspective．The paper,based on the theories of pragrnatics including Grices Cooperative Principle,Leech’s Politeness Principle and Brown I．avinson’s Face Theory,studies different responding strategi鼯employed by the two interviewees，summarizes the similarities and differences between the two，and describes possible factors that contribute to the differences． The paper starts with a brief review of literature on conversational analysis and the findings of research by domestic and foreign scholars in news interviews using conversational analysis approach．Then,it introduces main theories in pragmaties， including Cooperative Principle， maxim—flouting,Politeness Principle and face-threatening act，as well as different views of context,traditional and dynamic． Though the nature and characteristics of news intoviews request particil；ants to be familiar wi廿l the topics discussed in the process of questioning-answering and interviewees to be cooperative by answering questions sincerely and truthfully,pragmatic principles are not always observed in news interviews．as participants of news interview (interviewer and interviewee)may have different communicative intentions．To the interviewees，some questions may be too sharp and challenging which are raised only to satisfy audiences’ curiosity and thus face-threatening． If they a11swer the questions straightforwardly,they will lose face or even bring damage to themselves or the interest group they represent．Naturally,the interviewees will turn to commun