论剥夺政治权利的执行-法律学专业论文.docxVIP

摘 摘 要 摘 要 剥夺政治权利作为我国刑法分则中一项十分重要的(附加刑)资格刑，它 以剥夺犯罪人享有一定资格为内容，对犯罪人及犯罪行为作最明显的政治上的 否定评价。该刑从其诞生之同起就在保护守法公民、通过剥夺一定权利惩罚犯 罪方面发挥了积极作用，然而学界对该刑罚中政治权利的内容、适用对象、适 用方式、期限等方面始终存在着较大的争议。随着时间的推移，我国法治进程 的不断推进，各方面法制建设的不断完善，争议中产生了许多关于该刑罚的创 新理论，但在学界并未达成共识，其现实状况是该刑罚的各项适用性规定已经 逐步与现在的司法形势脱节，造成执行工作中频频遭遇窘境，甚至一度陷入僵 局，无法达到该刑罚执行的预期效果。 刑罚执行是达到刑罚目的实现刑罚作用的根本途径，也是唯一途径。所以 笔者认为剥夺政治权利在执行中所面临的困难与问题，应成为该项刑罚修改时 最应该加以考量的方面。本文中笔者以该刑罚执行中的问题作为写作思路的起 点，主要采用事实论证与事理论证相结合，中外比较论证与因果论证相结合的 方法来进行整篇文章的论述，文章第一部分从剥夺政治权利的理论入手，着重 阐述了“政治权利”一词的概念和特征，剥夺政治权利的立法沿革以及剥夺政 治权利的内容及特征；第二部分主要论述了剥夺政治权利的执行，主要从执行 主体、适用方式及适用对象三个方面进行；第三部分首先参考比较国外资格刑 的精华部分，这些舶来品中有很多方面对我国剥夺政治权利的发展有着非常重 要的指导和借鉴意义，其次从笔者的工作实践出发，总结目前我国剥夺政治权 利执行中的现状及诸多问题，最后通过对这些实际问题进行深入浅出的分析、 从实践出发提出针对性的解决方案，进而达到完善该刑罚执行的目的。 关键词：政治权利 剥夺政治权力刑执行完善 As As a very important qualification penalty(additional penalty)in criminal laws in China，the deprivation of political fights is to make a most obvious negative political evaluation on the criminal and the crime by depriving the criminal’S certain qualifications．This law has played a positive role from the date of its birth to protect the law-abiding citizens and to punish the criminals by depriving certain rights． However，there is always much controversy about the content of political rights，the object and mode of application，the duration and SO on in the academic field．As time goes on，the rules of laws have been continuously processed，the legal systems have been continuously improved and many innovation theories have been generated on this penalty during the controversy，although no consensus is concluded in the academic field．The reality is that the applicability of penalty provisions has been gradually disjointed from the current judicial situation and the expected results of implementation cannot be achieved due to the dilemmas frequently encountered during the implementation，even once an impasse． The execution of penalty is the fundamental way and the only way to realize the purpose of penalty and play the role of the penalty,SO th