论再审不加刑-诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

内容摘要再审不加刑制度是伴随着近代资产阶级的力量壮大和民主化程 内容摘要 再审不加刑制度是伴随着近代资产阶级的力量壮大和民主化程 度逐步提升而产生的。这一制度主要体现了对国家追诉权和刑罚权力 的限制，体现了对刑事诉讼中被告人基本人权和诉讼权利的保护，是 对再审制度可能产生弊端的修补。 刑事司法过程是一个复杂的过程，期间蕴含着多种价值冲突和制 度协调。我国刑事司法起步较晚，制度不甚成熟，尤其是再审司法实 践中存在很多不足，突出表现在被告人的诉讼主体地位得不到有效保 障，再审程序的启动随意性较大，通过再审加刑规避“上诉不加刑” 三个方面，这些都是刑事司法过分追求“实事求是”、“有错必纠”， 人民法院、人民检察院在再审环节的定位不明确等原因造成的不利后 果。再审不加刑原则的引入，将有利于保障“上诉不加刑”原则得 到贯彻和落实，有利于贯彻检审分离，控制和杜绝审判权的滥用，从 而进一步增强司法机关的责任感，更有利于鼓励被告人为自身利益积 极提起救济，从而有效实现刑事司法的真正价值。 为了改变这种现状，本文试图通过论述再审不加刑原则的正当 性，深入剖析这一原则所蕴含的价值理念。在理性看待司法实践中出 现的种种不足和弊端的基础上，从区分是否有利于被告人的角度对再 审不加刑原则的适用范围、再审程序的启动权分配、再审次数、再审 审级等多方面入手进行初步的制度设计。以期通过这种构想解决实践 中存在的一些问题。 关键词：再审不加刑 刑事司法 权利保障 ABSTRACTWith ABSTRACT With neoteric bourgeoisie strengthening and democratization improving．the system of retrial against punishment aggravation was brought forward to limit state right to prosecute and power of punishment as well as to protect culprit’S fundamental human rights and procedural rights，which remedies some possible faults arising from implementation of retrial system． Due to complexity of criminal proceedings，we must make balance on each kind of values and harmonize the conflicts among systems．For development of the criminal judicatory of China iS later than some other countries，the system is not mature any more；above all，there are so many defects existing in practice of retrial proceedings，especially in the following cases：1 1 the legal status of defendant in criminal proceedings can not be safeguarded effectually；2)retrial may be instituted optionally；3)the principle of appeal against punishment aggravation can be evaded by instituting retrial，which incurred by excessive pursuance of‘seeking truth from facts’and‘faults must be rectified’as well as indefinite role of courts and procuratorial organs in retrial proceedings．Introduction of the principle of retrial against punishment aggravation iS favorable for implementation of the principle of appeal against punishment aggravation，separation of prosecution from iudgment， limitation or pr