论社会典型行为模式下消费者权益的保护-经济法学专业论文.docxVIP

中文摘要在现代日常生活中，社会典型行为已经是人们为满足基本生活需要所必需从 中文摘要 在现代日常生活中，社会典型行为已经是人们为满足基本生活需要所必需从 事的行为。“社会典型行为”理论，是拉伦茨教授对豪普特教授的“事实契约关系 的第三种类型的发展。他认为由于强制缔约制度的存在，尤其是格式条款的普遍 使用，在很多情况下，当事人无须为真正的意思表示，即可成立法律行为。 在社会典型行为模式下，消费者的权益是经常受到侵害的。究其原因，是因 为在社会典型行为模式下，当事人在缔结合约时意思表示出现某些瑕疵，正是这 些瑕疵导致了处于优势地位的商品和服务的提供者经常性的侵犯消费者的权益。 由于立法上没有明确的规定，因此消费者的利益没有得到切实的保障。 本文就此问题将从历史发展、理论分析等角度对社会典型行为进行法律上的 分析，进而研究在社会典型行为模式下消费者合法权益受侵害的表现的形式以及 意思表示瑕疵产生的原因，结合发达国家有关社会典型行为模式的理论和审判实 践经验，根据我国的现实国情，探讨规制社会典型行为模式下保护消费者合法权 益的基本思路，供立法参考。 关键词：社会典型行为格式条款消费者权益 分类号： AB AB STRACT In modem times，The social typical act has been the basic act for regular consumers to meet their basic needs．The“social typical act’’theory Was expounded by professor Larenz to develop the mird type of professor Haupt’S theory of contract implied·in-fact．According to these theories，because of the existence of the compulsive contract and the standard form contract，the juristic act might be formed without the declaration of will of the parties in many circumstances． In the pattern of social typical act，there are always some beneficial invasions happened to consumers．When I find the causes，I know that under the pattern of social typical act，some flaws of the declaration of will arise when parties conclude their contracts．It is just these flaws that give the provider of products and services some privilege to invade the benefit of consumers regularly Because there are no specific regulations in the existing legislation，the consumers’welfare have no solid guarantee． Tllis article will conduct a legal analysis through the angle of historical development and theoretical analysis，then study the performance of the invasion of the consumers’welfare and the causes of the flaws of the declaration of will under the pattern of social typical act，combined with the theory of social typical act and the trial experience in developed countries，according to the realities of China’S national conditions，1 will discuss the basic ideas of hoW to protect the welfare of the consumers