论票据抗辩制度-法律·民商法专业论文.docxVIP

A B A B S T R A C T b ill-plea system p lays an im portan t role in th e law of n egotiab le in strum ents?con sidering that it help s to guarantee th e safety of th e circulation of b ill an d prom ote th e dev elop m ent com m ercial credit. T his article con sists of four parts， that is，the sum m ary o f bill-plea, the classification of th e bill-p lea ，the b ill-p lea restrictio n an d co u nter-lim itatio n s on b ill-p lea restriction an d th e last o ne isjaw m aking p erfectness. T h e th esis b eg in s w ith th e b asic th eo ry o f b ill-p lea. F ro m startin g w ith th e con cept and ch aracteristics of th e b ills,th en to su m m arize th e features an d function s of th e bills-p lea,furth erm ore,th e th esis states th e b ase o f legal p h ilo sop hy o f b ill-p lea sy stem from th e p ersp ectiv e o f th e v alu e , of econ om y an d of legal p rin ciple . S o as to catch on the theoretical an d logical significan ce for u s, exp ectin g to get a profo u nd un derstan din g of b ill-p lea sy stem . S econdly , th e th esis introdu ces th e traditional classification of bill-plea , then to ev alu ate it.A ccord in g to th e gen eral w ay ，th e bill-p lea is divid es in to tw o p arts, th e bill-p lea ab out object an d bill-p lea ab out p erson . It cau ses m uch troub le to defin e the b elon gin gs ab out object an d p erson . O th er latest ideas ab out th e classification still h av e d ifficu lty in m ak in g th em u n d ersto od . T h e au th o r sum m arizes th e ad v antag es an d disadv antages of th e v ario u s classification criteria ? to d iv id e it in to three categories，w h ich are b asin g on th e rights app earance of b ill-p lea,th e declaratio n of intention of bill-p lea an d th e relativ ely non cau sative n ature o f bill-p lea.S u ch classification reflects th e ch aracteristics of b ill-p lea w h ich is exp an ded relatin g to th e legal in stitutions, in order to fill th e category -sp ace w hich are