论刑民交叉案件的程序处理原则-法律·诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

的法律关系一时难以确定是刑事还是民事的情形，即刑民交叉案件：同一法律事 的法律关系一时难以确定是刑事还是民事的情形，即刑民交叉案件：同一法律事 实引起民事和刑事两种责任，且两种责任同时并存，被害人依法提起刑事附带民 事诉讼；同一法律事实引起民事和刑事两种责任，且两种责任同时并存，但被害 人未提起刑事附带民事诉讼或者法院认为不符合刑事附带民事诉讼受案范围而 不予受理附带民事诉讼。其次，明确在刑民判决既判力发生冲突的情况F，应当 采用审判监督程序撤销与刑事判决相矛盾的民事判决，而不能通过作出补正裁定 的方式来修正已经发生法律效力的民事判决。 本文选题来源于审判实践，故并不是单纯地研究理论。文章最大的特点是 采用了理论与实践相结合的写作方法，从典型案例入手，提出问题、分析问题， 进而达到解决问题的目的。 [关键词] 责任竞合、刑民交叉、刑事附带民事诉讼、证明标准、 先刑后民、既判力冲突 Procedural Procedural Principle for Interlocked Penal and Civil Cases Abstract It is a long—standing difficult problem that how to deal with the procedure for interlocked penal and civil cases．This has got broad attention from the professional and practicing society during last two to three years．However,there is no systematic research on what is real interlocked penal and civil case，as well as what is the juristical principle on solving interlocked penal and civil cases． First，by introducing several typical CriSes，this article will bring out the conuTlon procedural issues during the trail ofinterlocked penal and civil cases．Such issues give negative impact on the criminal and civil pmcedure，add litigation costs and make confusion Off law enfomemeut concept，and also are negative to protect the legal rights of the nation,collectivity and individual．Furthermore，it will impact the adjustment of social economical relations and have the public reasonably suspect the justice．This article discussed necessity and the imminence to study the pmcedural principle on solving interlocked penal and civil cases，from the urgent trial practice needs and thejuristical concept of“balance ofpublic and private rights”and“balance ofjus廿ce and efficiency’to construct modem law countly． To better study interlocked penal and civil cases，this article briefly introduced the main difference among the nature，purpose，starting method，evidence responsibility and evidenee standard for penal and civil cases．This article pointed out that the nature of the interlocked penal and civil case is the aggregation of