论民事举证时限制度-法律专业论文.docxVIP

I I Abstract The burden of proof to restrictions on the evidence cited in the civil system is one of the focus, but Chinas current civil law system time of the civil burden of proof are not clearly defined. With the reform of the civil justice is increasingly deepening, as a serious constraint to achieve the target value of civil burden of proof time the judicial system has aroused extensive attention. December 2001, the Supreme Peoples Court issued a civil evidence on a number of provisions （hereinafter referred to as certain provisions）, in the form of judicial interpretation to establish the time of the civil burden of proof system, which our system of civil litigation reform and development with far-reaching impact, but because of the limitations of judicial interpretation and their own shortcomings, it is difficult to meet the needs of modern civil litigation system. This paper will be based on Chinas judicial practice and learn from Western countries the burden of proof time of the main legislative system, through research and analysis system time civil burden of proof, in an effort to resolve litigation practice of the problems and the promotion of civil proof system perfect time, eventually Chinas model by civil parties to the terms of reference of the conversion procedures and systems to provide protection to both parties fully protect the rights of ideas and evidence, and it also enabled the parties to understand: the law or the peoples court within a specified period is an obligation to give evidence or responsibility, the burden of proof is the civil deadline should consciously abide by the rules, do not abuse the right to present new evidence at any time delay in the proceedings, evidence engage in other raids resulting in a disadvantageous position in litigation. Therefore, this article contains the body of seven parts, as well as the introduction and conclusion content. The first part is proof system of the time limits outlined. First time on