论民事诉讼证明妨碍制度-诉讼法专业论文.docxVIP

摘要 摘要 万方数据 万方数据 摘 要 证明妨碍是诉讼中普遍存在的现象，却没有得到重视。证明妨碍的形式随 着时间推移多种多样且日趋复杂化，若不进行规制，会造成当事人之间的利益 受损且不利于实现诉讼的公平和正义，而我国民事诉讼法和司法解释关于证明 妨碍行为的规定存在诸多不足，因此，完善法律和司法解释对证明妨碍的规定， 建立完善的证明妨碍制度成为理论和实践中急需解决的问题。本文首先论述了 证明妨碍的概念，在厘清概念之后进一步分析证明妨碍行为的构成要件和法理 基础，形成对证明妨碍行为初步了解。其次，论述先进国家和地区的证明妨碍 制度，为我国建立证明妨碍制度提供参考意见。再次，剖析我国证明妨碍行为 的规制现状以及存在的不足，在归纳总结当前对证明妨碍制度的法律适用效果 之后，针对所存在的缺陷，提出完善我国证明妨碍制度的建议，以及与其相适 应的配套制度，共同规制证明妨碍行为。 关键词：证明妨碍；构成要件；法律适用效果；制度完善 II Abst Abstract ABSTRACT We don’t pay much attention to the phenomenon of obstruction of evidence, although it is common in the suit. The form of obstruction of evidence varies over and becomes more complex. If it is not regulated by law, it will damage the interests between the parties and destroy the fairness and justice. There are many shortages of the regulation of obstruction of evidence in our civil litigation and judicial interpretation. Therefore it is an urgent problem to enrich the regulation in civil litigation and judicial interpretation and establish the system of obstruction of evidence. In this paper, firstly the concept of obstruction of evidence is described, then further analysis of the obstruction of evidence act and legal basis, so that have a preliminary understanding of obstruction of evidence. Secondly, it states the system of obstruction of evidence in different countries and regions, we can learn the experiences from them. Next this paper analyses the current situations and problems of our system obstruction of evidence. After the analysis of legal consequence, aim to the shortages of system of obstruction of evidence in our country, put forward the suggestions of the system of obstruction of evidence. Meanwhile it is necessary to set up the matching system to regulate the obstruction of evidence. So all the systems can regulate the obstruction of evidence together. Key Words: obstruction of evidence; elements; consequence; the improvement of institution III 目录 目录 目 录 引 言 1 第 1 章 民事诉讼证明妨碍行为的概念和构成要件 2 1.1 民事诉讼证明妨碍的概念 2 1.2 证明妨