论我国法院认定驰名商标法律制度的完善-法律·经济法专业论文.docxVIP

I I 摘 要 2001年7月，最高人民法院颁布实施的《关于审理涉及计算机域名民事纠纷案件 适用法律若干问题的解释》（以下简称《域名解释》），赋予法院依法认定驰名商标的 权力。时至今日，我国法院认定驰名商标制度已走过了七年的时间。由于驰名商标 凝聚了社会公众的充分信赖，成为消费者购买商品或者服务的重要凭证，随着我国 市场经济发展的不断深入，企业通过法院认定驰名商标成为日益强烈的司法需求， 客观上推动了相关法律制度的完善。但不可否认的是，现有的法律制度仍然不能满 足实践的需要，确立一套统一、公正、科学、完善的法院认定驰名商标制度成为当 前面临的一项迫切任务。本文围绕我国法院认定驰名商标的法律制度进行研究和探 讨，并提出一些建议和意见，全文共分三章。 第一章 主要阐述我国“法院认驰”法律制度存在的问题及其分析。该段在对 驰名商标进行一般性说明后，着重介绍了我国“法院认驰”制度的现状和存在的问 题及原因分析。 第二章 主要对国际公约和国外认定驰名商标的行为规则进行比较研究，藉此 从这些规则、规定中发现对完善我国法院认定驰名商标行为规则具有的参考和借鉴 意义。 第三章 立足我国实际，对如何进一步完善法院认定驰名商标法律制度提出设 想和建议。 关键词： 驰名商标 法院认定 完善 II II Abstract The issued and enacted of The Understanding Of Questions about Judgements Relating to Civil Trials of Domin-Name(Shorted as The Understanding of Domin-Name in later part of the essay) by the Supreme Peoples Court of China in July 2001 granted a right of assumption of Domin-Name Brands to the Court. Untill now, China’s system of the Court-assumpted Domin-Names has been in use for seven years. The Domin-Name Brands represent the trustbility of the civil society and become an important credence for the consumers to buy products and services. With China’s market economy developing in greater depth and the developing judicatory needs by the enterprises of Domin-Name Brands assumpted by the Court, objectively forced the improvment of relevent laws. However, we could not deny the fact that the current law system can’t satisfy the need of the practice in society. The primary task is to establish an uinified, fair, scientific and integrate Court-assumption system of well-known brands by the Court. This essay of three chapters studis and discusses the behaviors and regulations of Court assumpted well-known brands, and proposes opinions and suggestions. The first chapter elaborates and analyzes the existent problems of judicatory definition of well-known brands. After elaborating the judicatory definition of well-known brands, this paragraph mainly introduces the reasons of current situations and problems and analyzes the reasons