论我国法官民事诉讼违法行为的程序性责任诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

2 2 1 1 substantive liability, we introduces the unique advantages of procedural responsibility compared with substantive liability. The fourth part is the bear elements of a judge’s procedural responsibility. The article makes a specific introduction about the elements from the responsibility main body, the responsibility of the stare-up procedure, causality and necessity. The fifth part discusses construction of the judge’s procedural responsibility. First introduces the situation of the judge’s procedural responsibility in our country’s legislation and judicial, draw of the problems exist in the judge’s procedural liability. Then proposes ideas according to the questions which including the added sound in legislation and the construction of the procedure of investigation in judicial practice. The epilogue part determines the importance and urgency of the judge’s procedural responsibility again on the basis of summing all texts, at the same time, it points out that only formulating and perfecting the corresponding litigation system can the advantage of judge procedural liability provisions work out. Key words: the violation in civil litigation; procedural responsibility; the elements of responsibility constituting 目 录 引言 1 一、法官民事诉讼违法行为概述 2 （一）法官民事诉讼违法行为概念界定 2 （二）法官民事诉讼违法行为存在的原因分析 4 （三）法官民事诉讼违法行为的具体表现形态 6 （四）法官民事诉讼违法行为的危害 8 二、法官民事诉讼违法行为之程序性责任的概念及确立依据 10 （一）法官违法程序性责任的概念 10 （二）法官违法程序性责任确立的依据 11 三、法官违法程序性责任与实体性责任比较分析13 （一）概念简述 13 （二）实体性责任方式的缺陷 14 （三）程序性责任方式的优势 16 四、法官违法程序性责任构成要件和承担要件18 （一）法官违法程序性责任构成要件 18 （二）法官违法程序性责任承担要件 19 五、法官违法程序性责任的构建21 （一）我国法官违法程序性责任的现状 21 （二）法官违法程序性责任规则的重构 26 （三）法官违法程序性责任追究程序的构建 33 结语37 参考文献38 致谢40 论我 论我国法官民事诉讼违法行为的程序性责任 西南 西南政法大学硕士学位论文 1 1 2 2 引言 在法学理论中，有权利必有义务，违反义务必要承担责任。法律责任作为法律规则 的逻辑构成是任何一部法律顺利实施所必须具备的条件，是法律权利得以实现的保障。 在法律面前人人平等原则的约束下，除了规定普通公民的违法责任外，对于掌握国家公 权力的审判人员违法行为的责任追究要规定的更严格和详细。为了更好的实现责任规则 对权利的保障作用，减少审判实践中出现的公权力滥用，最先在刑事诉讼法理论中出现 了“诉讼行为无效”，“非法证据排除规则”等程序性的责任承担方式。 在我国民事诉讼法律中鲜有对法官民