论我国完善的鉴定人出庭质证制度的构建侦查学专业论文.docxVIP

论我 论我国完善的鉴定人出庭质证制度的构建 PAGE PAGE 3 4 4 Abstract With the rapidly changing of science and technology changes each new day, professional problems of litigation practice emerge in endlessly. Appraisal opinions (People also call it appraisal conclusion. From the perspective of the latest amendment of points , call it appraisal opinions is a new understanding, is a big trend, also conforms to the nature of the judicial identification evidence, so this paper adopt the appraisal opinions, said),as three big lawsuit important evidence types of key role also more and more get peoples attention. But, constrained by theoretical knowledge deviation, legislative vacancy, system construction defects, the practice operation, such as the lack of a series of factors, our countrys judicial identification system malpractice frequency now, especially in the expert witnesses to appear in court cross-examination the important link, the appearance rate is low, the court cross-examination become a mere formality, appear cross-examination poor effect problems, has severely damaged the people to the appraisal opinions scientific and authoritative trust, weaken the appraisal opinions in the litigation should be the proof that the action of the play, and also easy to midwifery endless judicial authentication and so on the judicial appraisal problems arise, even had become a block litigation proof process and restricting the judicial appraisal development bottleneck. In view of this, the author thinks that our country at present the appraiser to appear in court to solve the problems existing in the cross-examination of the key lies in of our country at first appraiser to appear in court cross-examination system present situation have a comprehensive understanding, then from theoretical knowledge, legal system, macroscopic litigation background, realistic considerations and so on many levels and Angle to the reason of the problem produced systematic in-depth analysis, in the foreign correspo