- 1、本文档共46页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
例由上述各包括各研究的果研究之的同性以及可能影分析果的各研究性作者均有提及因此合研究分析是合理的由上表中可知研究果以作呈以此表例比各研究灸一般西治的差性以指配合信估各研究在的左右任何一端且不超越的另一有著差此外在不同分群分做出混合重的合分析以估著差性最後再做整的合分析最示表示灸治西一般相比是有著差性的本研究完整性集各的灸治耳床是至今最完整的一篇系性回文章本系性回明灸可能提供耳患者有床性效益但因去床研究存在多方法上的缺陷因此未若有更完整的床提供更好的明灸的效性如右表灸治照是否有差有使用信在的右我就
the results were similar from study to study (look for tests of heterogeneity) 舉例:The results of the meta-analysis showed it had significant difference between acupuncture and sham treatments. Analysis of the acupuncture and sham treatments (measured with simply scoring) favored the regimen (RR = 2.49, 95 % CI = 1.06–5.84). There were significant differences between these two groups (p = 0.04), while no heterogeneity existed between these two RCTs (I2 = 39.9 %). the reasons for any variations in results are discussed The acupuncture points used in these 18 RCTs were different; this may be because of the specificity of acupuncture trials. The number of treatment sessions also varied from study to study, although for most of the RCTs conducted in China, about 30 sessions were held. This variable likely has an effect on treatment effectiveness and furthermore could be the reason for unsatisfactory results in studies involving fewer treatment sessions (such as those English studies). 由上述各細項檢視,包括各研究詳細的結果、研究之間的同質性以及可能影響分析結果的各研究變異性,作者均有提及,因此併合研究分析是合理的。 6. How are the results presented and what is the main result? Consider: how the results are expressed (e.g. odds ratio, relative risk, etc.) 由上表中可知研究結果以relative risk作為呈現 以此圖表為例,比較各研究針灸與一般西醫治療的差異性,以RR (relative risk)為統計指標,並配合95%CI (信賴區間)評估。各單獨研究,當RR在1的左右任何一端,且CI線不超越1的另一頭,視為有顯著差異。此外,在不同分組群裡,分別做出混合權重的統合分析,並以p-value評估顯著差異性,最後再做整體的統合分析,最終顯示RR = 1.18, 95 % CI = 1.02–1.37, p = 0.03,表示針灸治療組與西醫一般醫療組相比是有顯著差異性的。 how large this size of result is and how meaningful it is The 18 RCTs included 1,086 patients: 580 patients in either a traditional acupuncture or electrical acupuncture group and 506 patients in the control group. Most studies had relatively small sample sizes. Only two had more than 100 samples. Mean age among study patients was 46 years (ranging from 18 to 72) and 49 % of the patients were males. The causes of the tinnitus reported in these studies were largely unknown. The duration of
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2019新外研社版一起点小学英语四年级上册单词听写及句子默写整理好直接打印版.pdf VIP
- 西软宽带安全审计管理软件说明书.doc
- 监理公司各部门职责.doc
- 国家电网公司配电网工程防触电、防高坠、防倒杆“三十条”工作措施.doc VIP
- 会阴擦洗的护理流程课件.ppt
- 《江苏省水利工程施工质量检验与评定规范》:建筑工程(附录).doc
- 2021年人教版五年级语文下册期末检测5套.pdf VIP
- 24186企业法务[纸考]2023.12.docx
- 初中物理大气压强习题(附有答案).doc VIP
- 2024年03月四川省南充市财政局及局属参公事业单位2024年公开遴选(考调)工作人员笔试参考题库附带答案详解.docx VIP
文档评论(0)