科技论文写作结课作业.docxVIP

PAGE7 / 7 科技论文写作结课作业 单位： xxxxxx 姓名： 学号： 导师： 电话：  导师评语： The Comparison Between Moving Target Defense Frameworks Abstract Ineffective performance of traditional defense system facing constantly-developing multifarious network attacks leads to the rapid development of Moving Target Defense (MTD). In this paper, we divided existing technologies of MTD to four groups based on the comparison of MTD and Mimic Security Defense (MSD). Then, we present the differences between the generic framework for MTD and MOTAG (Moving Target Defense against Internet Denial of Service Attacks). We analyze and highlight some improving suggestions for the greedy shuffling algorithm. Keywords: Moving Target Defense? Mimic Security Defense?Shuffling?Framework Introduction The number and scale of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks have increased at an incredible rate over the past decade [1]. Meanwhile, the cost of carrying out a DDoS attack has declined surprisingly fast. A Trend Micro’s whitepaper [2] has exposed that $150 is enough to launch 1-week DDoS attack on Russian. Thereinto, data center is the severely afflicted area of DDoS attacks. In addition, dazzled Trojans and vulnerability in various applications lead to the leakage of personal information even loss or damage to property. Bloomberg reported that the hackers “exploited an overlooked flaw in one of the bank’s websites” [3]. Beyond that, all kinds of new attacks have sprung up in recent decades, like BadUSB and Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) which is one of the most serious threats to critical infrastructures. As stated above, with the fast development of Internet, multifarious network attacks have emerged endlessly and traditional defense strategies have been powerless. To put it simply, traditional defense system can be classified as static defensive mechanism, composed of Firewall and Encrypted Authentication System, and dynamic defensive mech