- 1、本文档共38页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Improving metacognitive accuracy: How failing to retrieve practice items reduces overconfidence;abstract;The present experiments examined whether a small number of retrieval practice opportunities would improve participants’ metacognitive accuracy by reducing overconfidence. ;1. Introduction;Studies today show a similar pattern for college-aged participants.
They predict that they will earn a much better score on a given test than they actually do (for one example see Hacker, Bol, Horgan, Rakow, 2000).
People are also overconfident in other abilities, including their driving ability (Knouse, Bagwell, Barkley, Murphy, 2005).
Ability to complete projects before deadlines (Buehler, Griffin, Ross, 1994).;More accurate metacognition is associated with better academic performance (Everson Tobias,1998) and memory performance (Thiede et al., 2003, 2005). Other studies have confirmed the link between accurate metacognition and improved performance (e.g., Nelson, Dunlosky, Graf, Narens, 1994).
准确的元认知在教育环境中尤其有利,更准确的元认知和更好的学业成绩(Everson Tobias,1998)和记忆成绩(Thiede et al., 2003, 2005)相关。其他的研究也证实准确的元认知和成绩的提高之间有关联(e.g., Nelson, Dunlosky, Graf, Narens, 1994)。;;1.1. The effects of testing on metacognition;Relationship between testing and metacognition?
One, are people aware of the benefits of testing ?
Answer is mixed.
Two, does testing improve metacognition?
Have little effect on metacognition accuracy (Karpicke Roediger,2008)
主要原因是强调测试对随后测试成绩的影响而没有关注元认知,另一个是缺少对照组。;1.2. The present experiments;We also examined the role of failure (vs. success) in retrieving a single practice item on subsequent judgments (Experiment 2) and how much failure is needed to improve the accuracy of participants’ predictions (Experiment 3).
实验2考察提取单个项目失败或成功对后来判断的作用,实验3考察失败多少次才能提高被试预测的准确性。
In each of the three experiments, participants were asked to make global performance predictions before and after engaging in retrieval practice or no retrieval practice.
每个实验中,在被试提取练习之前或提取练习之后或没有提取中都对总成绩
您可能关注的文档
- 惠泰生态农业示范园3.3万亩(生态示范).doc
- 戏剧的文学常识(张慧转).ppt
- 戏曲之基本功.pptx
- 成功演讲的21个秘密-中文.ppt
- 情景9 网络服务器配置.ppt
- 成渝经济区城市化发展与一体化进程问题初探.doc
- 成都市高二五校联考.ppt
- 成都电大2016秋临床营养学.docx
- 慢病项目产品课件.pptx
- 我们生机勃勃的家园.ppt
- [甘肃]2025年甘肃交通职业技术学院招聘博士研究生笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解.doc
- [甘肃]2025年甘肃林业职业技术大学现代农业工程学院招聘硕士学历学位专业教师笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解.doc
- [甘肃]2024年甘肃省直某部门下属正处级事业单位招聘笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解.doc
- xx县跨境电商项目合作计划书.docx
- 关于核能,你了解多少?.docx
- [甘肃]2024年甘肃省自然资源厅直属事业单位招聘32人笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解.doc
- [甘肃]2024年甘肃机电职业技术学院招聘硕士研究生10人笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解.doc
- 中西医结合治疗糖尿病足的研究进展.ppt
- [甘肃]2025年中共甘肃省委统战部所属事业单位招聘7人笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解.doc
- [甘肃]2025上半年甘肃省残疾人联合会直属事业单位招聘4人笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解.doc
文档评论(0)