- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
????
三维超声心动图测定机械瓣瓣口面积初步经验
????
????
摘 要:目的 观察三维超声心动(3DE)测定机械瓣瓣口面积的可行性。方法 11例机械瓣置换病例,用任意切面(anyplane)3DE测定机械瓣瓣口有效面积,将测定值与多普勒超声心动(DE)测定的有效瓣口面积(包括实测值和文献报道测值)及生产厂商提供的离体瓣口面积比较。结果 3DE测定机械瓣有效瓣口面积为(2.73±0.88) cm2与DE实测值(2.45±0.77)cm2及文献报道DE测值(2.85±0.96) cm2比较无明显差异(P0.05)。3DE测值与DE实测值的相关性为r=0.755,与文献报道DE测值的相关性为r=0.919。生产厂商提供的离体瓣口面积为(4.06±1.09)cm2与3DE测值,DE实测值及文献报道DE测值比较均有明显差异(P0.01),在本研究中3DE测定在体机械瓣瓣口平均面积仅为生产厂商提供的离体瓣口平均面积的(66.8±9.7)%,但二者之间相关性为0.910。对同一观查者相隔半个月以上的两次3DE测值进行比较,未见明显差异(P0.001)。结论 据初步经验用3DE测定机械瓣瓣口面积在二尖瓣位是准确可行的,在主动脉瓣位由于例数太少尚需进一步研究。超声心动在体实测值与生产厂商提供的离体瓣口面积有明显差异可能与多种因素有关。关键词:超声心动描记术,三维;心脏瓣膜,人工
Primary experience on quantitative assessment of mechanical prosthetic valve area by three-dimensional echocardiography
LI Yue(Ultrasound Department of General Hospital of PLA,Beijing 100853,China)Herman FJ Mannaerts,Otto Kamp,et al.(Cardiovascnlar institute of Free university teaching hospital,Amsterdam,Natherlands)
Abstract:Objective To determine the feasibility of three-dimensional echocardiography(3DE) in assessment of mechanical prosthetic valve areas.Methods Eleven patients with mechanical prosthetic valve replacement were included into the study.The effective orifice areas(EOA) of mechanical prosthetic valve were assessed by anyplane mode of 3DE and compared with EOA deriverd by Doppler echocardiography(DE,which included real measurement and published literature) and provided by manufactures.Results There were no significant difference between the EOA assessed by 3DE[(2.73±0.88) cm2] and derived from DE [real measurement=(2.45±0.77) cm2,published literature=(2.85±0.96) cm2] (all P0.05).A good correlation was observed between the EOA assessed by 3DE and derived from DE (r=0.755 and 0.919,all P0.01).The EOA provided by manufacturers was (4.06±1.09) cm2,which differed significantly from the EOA assessed by 3DE and derived from DE.The percentage of the EOA assessed by 3DE to the manufacturers orifice areas was (66.8±9.7)%.However,a good correlation was observed between the
文档评论(0)