GIS局部放电检测中特高频法与超声波法灵敏度的对比研究.docVIP

第27卷第3期2010年6月 现 代 电 力 M oder n Electr ic P ow er V ol 27 N o 3 June 2010文章编号:1007 2322(201003 0031 06 文献标识码:A GIS 局部放电检测中特高频法与超声波法 灵敏度的对比研究 吴张建1,2 ,李成榕1 ,齐 波1 ,郝 震1 ,耿弼博 1 (1 华北电力大学高电压与电磁兼容北京市重点实验室,北京 102206;2 华北电网有限公司,北京 100045 Partial Discharge Detection for GIS:A Comparison of Sensitivity Between UHF and Ultrasonic Methods Wu Zhang jian 1,2,Li Chengrong 1,Qi Bo 1,H ao Zhen 1,Geng Bibo 1 (1.Beijing Key Labor ator y o f High V oltage EM C,N orth China Electric Pow er U niv ersity ,Beijing 102206,China; 2.No rth China Gr id Com pany L imited,Beijing 100045,China 基金项目:北京市教委实验室共建项目(2007 摘 要:为对特高频法和超声波法在GIS 设备局部放电检测中的灵敏度进行对比,以实际的GIS 设备为基础,建立了一套220kV GIS 局部放电检测平台,模拟了实际中较为常见的5类放电缺陷,利用特高频法和超声波法对5类缺陷在不同电压下的局部放电同时进行了测量,并对两者获得的起始放电电压、平均视在放电量、放电次数和放电幅值进行了比较。试验结果表明:特高频法对上述5类局部放电的检测均较为灵敏;超声波法对GIS 设备中绝缘子表面自由金属颗粒缺陷、绝缘子表面设备外壳内侧金属尖刺缺陷以及高压导体接触不良缺陷引起的局部放电的检测较为灵敏,但与特高频检测法相比,灵敏度仍然略低。因此建议以特高频作为GIS 设备内部缺陷检测和诊断的主要手段,超声波法为辅助检测手段。 关键词:气体绝缘变电站;局部放电;特高频法;超声波法Abstract:To compare sensitivity of partial discharge detec tion for GIS between UHF and ultrasonic method,a partial discharge detection platform f or 220kV GIS is built based on real GIS equipment.Five cases of partial defect (PDdis charges are simulated,and their values under diff erent volt age level are m easured by using of UHF and ultrasonic meth od.At the same time,such values as initial discharge volt age,average apparent discharge magnitude,discharge times and discharge amplitude,are com pared.It can be seen f rom results that,1U HF m ethod show higher sensitivity in de tecting the five types of partial discharges;2ultrasonic method is sensitive in detecting partial discharges caused by f ree metallic particles on insulator,mental sharps on inner shell of insulator,and f loating electrode on high voltage conductors,but its sensitivity is low er than that of U HF method.Therefore,it is suggest ed that UHF should be used as major method to detect and diagnose inner defect in GIS,and ultrasonic method as assist detect measure. Key w