C 《闽教人[2015]48号文件》的合宪性-改.docVIP

北京师范大学珠海分校法律与行政学院 北京师范大学珠海分校法律与行政学院 闽教人[2015]48号文件的合宪性 摘 要 福建省教育厅、人社厅、编办与财政厅于2015年六月联合出版了《闽教人[2015]48号文件》，制定《福建省师范生免费教育试点办法（试行）》，实行公益性师范类培养实验，招生对象仅限男生。本文第二部分以该《办法》作为对象，分析规范性文件的合宪性，以为私权救济提供参考为目的。相关标准应采取 “严格的合理性审查基准”。根据以上，仅限男生的免费师范教育政策的途径和对出色师范类人才的培训的目标要有实质性的关系。但因为此策略与现实的不符，这二者之中并不存在实质性的联系，相反会造成性别隔离的不公平的现象。第三部分以女性主义法学的视角审视“男生免费师范教育”，通过揭露《办法》所突显的教育行业待遇过低的困境与女性发展空间问题，提出如何避免教育政策制定中的不合理的差别对待。 关键词：合宪性；审查基准；女性主义法学；免费师范教育 北京师范大学珠海分校法律与行政学院 The Constitutionality of No.48 document of the Fujian Provincial Education Department in 2015 ABSTRACT Fujian Provincial Departments of Education, human resources and social security, Provincial Party committee commission in charge of government establishments and the Finance Department published jointly No.48 Document of Provincial Education Department in June 2015, to deliver Free Normal Education Measures of Fujian Province (for Trial Implementation), and start a free education pilot for male only. The second part takes the measures as an object, analysis of constitutionality of this normative document, aim to underlie right relief. The standard of review shall adopt Strict Standard for Examining the Justification. Accordingly, policy means of Free Normal Education for male only were supposed to be materiality associated with purpose, cultivating excellent teachers. But backfire, because of the unreasonable policy, there is no correlation between the means and purpose. Instead, it leads to unfair gender segregation. The third part reviews Free Normal Education Measures for boys from the perspective of Feminist Jurisprudence, discoveries the dilemma of education industry lower salary by exposing the difficulties of Female sustainable development, proposing how to avoid discrimination in education policy making. Keywords ：Constitutionality; Standard of review; Feminist jurisprudence; Free normal education 北京师范大学珠海分校法律与行政学院 目 录 TOC \o 1-3 \h \z \u 6955 引言：男生免费师范教育政策引发违宪质疑 1 14236 一、《闽教人[2015]48号文件》 1 10223 （一） 《福建省师范生免费教育试点办法（试行