哈佛公开课justice 第一课字幕 中英对照精解.docVIP

Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? Episode One episode [epis?ud] n. 插曲, 一段情节, 片段, 轶事 PART ONE: THE MORAL SIDE OF MURDER 谋杀的道德侧面 moral [m?r?l] adj. 道德 的 If you had to choose between (1) killing one person to save even though you knew that five others and (2) doing nothing the lives of five people hypothetical [haip?uθetik?l] adj.假设的,假定的,爱猜想的 scenario [sina:ri?u] n. 情节梗概, 剧本 would die right before your eyes if you did nothing—what would you do? reasoning [ri:zni?] n. 推论, 推理, 论证 What would be the right thing to do? That’s the hypothetical scenario vote [v?ut] n. 投票, 选举v. 投票, 选举, Professor Michael Sandel uses to launch his course on moral reasoning. conundrum [k?n?ndr?m] n. 谜语, 难题 表决 After the majority of to save the lives of students votes for killing the one person in order five others, Sandel presents three similar moral artfully [a:tfuli] adv.艺术地,有技巧地,熟练地,狡诈地 defend [difend] v. 防护, 辩护, 防守 conundrums—each one artfully designed to make the decision more conflict [k?nflikt] n.冲突,矛盾vi. 冲突, difficult. As students stand up to defend their conflicting choices, it conflicting [k?nflikti?] adj. 相冲突的 becomes clear that the assumptions behind our moral reasoning are often defend [difend] v. 防护, 辩护, 防守 争执 contradictory, and the question of always black and white. what is right and what is wrong is not assumption [?s?mp??n] n.假定,设想,担任(职责等),假装 contradictory [.k?ntr?dikt?ri] adj. 矛盾的n.矛盾 PART TWO: THE CASE FOR CANNIBALISM 食人肉案件 cannibalism [k?nib?liz?m] n.吃人肉的习性, 同类相食 Sandel introduces the principles of utilitarian philosopher, Jeremy utilitarian [.ju:tilit??ri?n] n.功利主义者adj.功利的,实用 Bentham, with a famous nineteenth century legal case involving a legal [li:g?l] adj. 法律的, 合法的, 法定 的 的 shipwrecked crew of decides to kill the four. After nineteen days weakest amongst them, the lost at sea, the captain young cabin boy, so that shipwrecked [?iprekt] adj. 失事的, 遭海难的 crew [kru:] n. 全体船员 the rest can feed on his blood and body to survive. The case sets up amongst [?m??st] prep. 在 ... 之中,