动物实验英语辩论.pdfVIP

Animal Experimentation Summary: Is it morally acceptableto experiment on non-human animals to develop products and medicines that benefit human beings? For many centuries people have experimented on animals. There are two main reasons for doing this: first, to find out more about the animals themselves, and, secondly, to test substances and procedures to see if they are harmful (with a view to deciding whether or not they can be used on human beings). In the second category fall cosmetic products as well as medicines and surgical techniques. There is a growing consensus that it is not acceptable to test cosmetic products on animals. This debate is about whether we should experiment on animals for scientific and medical purposes. The debate about the pros and cons of animal experimentation (or vivisection) is one that elicits very strong emotions: animal rights activists have resorted to trespass, violence, death threats, and hunger strikes in their single-minded (and sometimes illegal) mission to end this practice. Pros Cons Experiments on animals should be considered on a case-by-case basis. TheAnimals have the right to be treated as proper principle to apply, however, is that beings of value in themselves, not as the the reduction of human suffering is our first means to human ends; this principle must priority and the prevention of animal be applies in order to guarantee the end of suffering or death is secondary to thatcruelty to animals. The application of this (although still important). So that if there is principle means that animals should never a decent chance that an experiment will be experimented upon whatever the result in an important medical breakthroughpotential gain for humanity. To infect that will reduce human suffering and death monkeys with the AIDS virus or to expose