- 6
- 0
- 约6.37千字
- 约 8页
- 2021-01-05 发布于天津
- 举报
xx 年真题分析详解
下面是的真题分析法,希望对大家有所帮助。
TherewilleventuallyeadaywhenTheNewYorkTimesceasestopublishs toriesonnewsprint.Exactlywhenthatdaywillbeisamatterofdebate . ” Sometimeinthefuture, ”thepaper spublishersaidbackinxx.
Nostalgiaforinkonpaperandtherustleofpagesaside,there splentyofincentivetoditchprint.Theinfrastructurerequiredtom akeaphysica In ewspaper — prin ti ngpresses,deliverytrucks — isn
tjustexpensive;it sexcessiveatatimewhenonline —
onlypetitorsdon thavethesamesetoffinancialconstraints.Readersaremigratingaw ayfromprintanyway.Andthoughprintadsalesstilldwarftheironlin eandmobilecounterparts,revenuefromprintisstilldeclining.
Overheadmaybehighandcirculationlower,butrushingtoeliminatei tsprinteditionwouldbeamistake,saysBuzzFeedCEOJonahPeretti.
PerettisaystheTimesshouldn twastetimegettingoutoftheprintbusiness,butonlyiftheygoabout doingittherightway. “Figuringoutawaytoaeleratethattransitionwouldmakesensefort
hem,” hesaid, “ butifyoudiscontinueit,you
regoinghaveyourmostloyalcustomersreallyupsetwithyou. ” Sometimesthat
sworthmakingachangeanyway.PerettigivestheexampleofNetflixdi scontinuingitsDVD-mailingservicetofocusonstreaming.
“ Itwasseenasblunder, ” hesaid.Themoveturnedouttobeforesighted.AndifPerettiwereinch argeattheTimes? ”Iwouldn tpickayeartoendprint, ” hesaid
“ Iwouldraisepricesandmakeitintomoreofalegacyproduct. ”
Themostloyalcustomerswouldstillgettheproducttheyfavor,theid eagoes,andthey dfeelliketheywerehelpingsustainthequalityofsomethingtheybel ievein. “Soifyou reoverpayingforprint,youcouldfeellikeyouwerehelping, ” Perettisaid.
“Thenincreaseitatahigherrateeachyearandessentiallytrytogen erateadditionalrevenue. ”Inotherwords,ifyou
regoingtomakeaprintproduct,makeitforthepeoplewhoarealreadyo bsessedwithit.WhichmaybewhattheTimesisdoingalready.Gettingt hepri ntediti on seve ndaysaweekcosts nearly$500ayear —
moretha ntwiceasmuchasadigital — onl ysubscripti on.
“It sareallyhardthingtodoandit
satremendousluxurythatBuzzFeeddoesn thavealegacybusiness, Perettiremark
原创力文档

文档评论(0)