- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
FEMS Manuscript Central – submission FEMS Manuscript Central – title Publishing in English-language Scientific Journals Beijing, 21 th October 2008 Patrik M. Bavoil 柏霈德 Professor Chair, Dept of Microbial Pathogenesis, University of Maryland Chief Editor, FEMS Immunology Medical Microbiology Dos and Dont in Scientific Publishing Perspectives ? The Editor – FEMS Immunology Medical Microbiology ? The Publisher – Wiley-Blackwell Why is publication so important? ? Registration – establish your ownership and priority ? Certification – acknowledgement of the quality of your work through publication in a specific journal ? Dissemination – inform your peer group (and others) of your work ? Archiving - provide a permanent record of your work – “the minutes of science” ? Funding – publication is important to justify your current grant and to acquire funding in the future Good practice in publication ethics support these goals ? Honesty and integrity are essential if the science is to be validated ? Researchers (authors), editors, publishers and funders are all responsible So, is there a problem? How honest are researchers? ? 0.3% admitted a major offence ? 6% failed to present data contradicting their previous research ? 12% overlooked others use of flawed data Martinson et al Nature 2005;435:737-8 Report by the Gallup Organization for The Office of Research Integrity ? “Observing and Reporting Suspected Research Misconduct in Biomedical Research” – Survey of 4,298 randomly selected, NIH-funded principal investigators – 2,226 replied, 51% response rate – 192 reported observing 265 cases of research misconduct – Simple extrapolation from this might predict 2300 cases per year amongst 155,000 NIH-supported scientists – But ORI investigates only a small number (24) each year – Disparity may be partially explained by other reasons but report concluded that there is likely
文档评论(0)