华工信号分析与处理课件俞祝良老师-1.ppt

How to interpret? %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% zos=zeros(1,1); x=[1 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 1]; h=[1 1 1]; re1=conv(x,h); figure, subplot(311),plot([zos,x,zos],-*); subplot(312),plot([zos,h,zos],-*); subplot(313),plot([zos,re1,zos],-*); title(direct convolution) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% [xf,xw]=freqz(x,1,100); [hf,hw]=freqz(h,1,100); [re2,temp]=invfreqz(xf.*hf,xw,20,0); figure, subplot(311),plot([zos,x,zos],-*); subplot(312),plot([zos,h,zos],-*); subplot(313),plot([zos,re2,zos],-*); title(DTFT convolution) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% xf=fft(x); hf=fft([h, zeros(1,length(x)-length(h))]); re3=real(ifft(xf.*hf)); figure, subplot(311),plot([zos,x,zos],-*); subplot(312),plot([zos,h,zos],-*); subplot(313),plot([zos,re3,zos],-*); title(DFT convolution) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% zos=zeros(1,10); xf=fft([x, zos]); hf=fft([h, zeros(1,length(x)-length(h)),zos ]); re4=real(ifft(xf.*hf)); figure, subplot(311),plot([zos,x,zos],-*); subplot(312),plot([zos,h,zos],-*); subplot(313),plot([zos,re4,zos],-*); title(DFT convolution with zero appendix) 傅里叶变换就是这么复杂，也是这么简单！ Fourier Transform, DTFT and S Transform, Z Transform We have FT, DTFT to analyze the LTI systems and signals, why we still need ST and ZT? * Representation of Aperiodic Signals Finite integral interval Periodicity * Definition of LT * Definition of ZT Relationship between DTFT and ZT * Relationship between FT and LT * Laplace Transform * Z Transform * Fourier Transform, DTFT and S Transform, Z Transform We have FT, DTFT to analyze the LTI systems and signals, why we still need ST and ZT? ST is an extension of FT ZT is an extension of DTFT ST and ZT could process LTI system which may not be stable. S-Transform Z-Transform * * * * * * Connection between Sampling Interval and Peoroid in Corresponding domain * Representation of a continuous-time signal by its samples (Impulse-train Sampling) Discrete vs. Periodic I promise to give proof! How to express an periodic signal? Easy proof Periodic vs Discrete Important conclusions!