corporatefarming measures in a post jones world：corporatefarming措施在后琼斯的世界.pdfVIP

F ile: Schutz Macro FINAL.doc Created on: 6/10/2009 7:21:00 PM Last Printed: 6/30/2009 3:48:00 PM CORPORATE-FARMING MEASURES IN A POST- JONES WORLD Anthony B. Schutz * I. Introduction 98 II. General Attributes of Corporate-Farming Restrictions 107 A. Restricted Activities: Owning Agricultural Land and Farming 108 B. Industry-Specific Exceptions 111 C. Family-Farm Corporations Exceptions 111 1. Ownership Structure 112 2. Income Tests 112 3. Qualifying Activities 113 4. Location: ―The Farm‖ 117 III. The DCC Doctrine and the Jones View of Discrimination 119 IV. Consequences: Family Farm Entities 123 V. Other Complications Arising from Jones : Authorized Entities 129 A. Missouri, South Dakota, Oklahoma Wisconsin 129 B. Kansas 130 C. Iowa 132 D. Minnesota 133 E. North Dakota 134 F. Nebraska‘s Bill 134 VI. More Facial Discrimination: Foreign Corporations qua Foreign Corporations 135 VII. Other Possible DCC Doctrine Solutions the Prospect of Discriminatory Purpose 139 VIII. Conclusion 142 APPENDIX – LB 593, Nebraska Legislature (2009) 97 File: Schutz Macro FINAL.doc Created on: 6/10/2009 7:21:00 PM Last Printed: 6/30/2009 3:48:00 PM 98 Drake Journal of Agricultural Law [Vol. 14 I. INTRODUCTION Corporate-farming restrictions are one of the many are